SLPL SHROOM at SemEval2024 Task 06: A comprehensive study on models ability to detect hallucination
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Language models, particularly generative models, are susceptible to hallucinations, generating outputs that contradict factual knowledge or the source text. This study explores methods for detecting hallucinations in three SemEval-2024 Task 6 tasks: Machine Translation, Definition Modeling, and Paraphrase Generation. We evaluate two methods: semantic similarity between the generated text and factual references, and an ensemble of language models that judge each other's outputs. Our results show that semantic similarity achieves moderate accuracy and correlation scores in trial data, while the ensemble method offers insights into the complexities of hallucination detection but falls short of expectations. This work highlights the challenges of hallucination detection and underscores the need for further research in this critical area.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2024.
Builds on
7 of 12 references.
References · 7
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,856
- 2023The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lyingcited by 659
- 2020Language-agnostic BERT Sentence Embeddingcited by 627
- 2023LLM-Blender: Ensembling Large Language Models with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusioncited by 564
- 2023A Stitch in Time Saves Nine: Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations of LLMs by Validating Low-Confidence Generationcited by 206
- 2021A Token-level Reference-free Hallucination Detection Benchmark for Free-form Text Generationcited by 138
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.