mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Accurate estimation of feature importance faithfulness for tree models

arXiv 2404.03426 ↗First posted 4 Apr 2024cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we consider a perturbation-based metric of predictive faithfulness of feature rankings (or attributions) that we call PGI squared. When applied to decision tree-based regression models, the metric can be computed accurately and efficiently for arbitrary independent feature perturbation distributions. In particular, the computation does not involve Monte Carlo sampling that has been typically used for computing similar metrics and which is inherently prone to inaccuracies. Moreover, we propose a method of ranking features by their importance for the tree model's predictions based on PGI squared. Our experiments indicate that in some respects, the method may identify the globally important features better than the state-of-the-art SHAP explainer

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2024.

Builds on

14 of 22 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  4. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
  5. 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 523
  6. 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 467
  7. 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 310
  8. 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 309
  9. 2020A Survey on the Explainability of Supervised Machine Learningcited by 225
  10. 2022OpenXAI: Towards a Transparent Evaluation of Model Explanationscited by 125
  11. 2018Model Agnostic Supervised Local Explanationscited by 83
  12. 2021Synthetic Benchmarks for Scientific Research in Explainable Machine Learningcited by 59
2 more
  1. 2022The Road to Explainability is Paved with Bias: Measuring the Fairness of Explanationscited by 41
  2. 2022Fairness via Explanation Quality: Evaluating Disparities in the Quality of Post hoc Explanationscited by 40

Built on by

Not cited yet.