Site-specific Deterministic Temperature and Humidity Forecasts with Explainable and Reliable Machine Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Site-specific weather forecasts are essential to accurate prediction of power demand and are consequently of great interest to energy operators. However, weather forecasts from current numerical weather prediction (NWP) models lack the fine-scale detail to capture all important characteristics of localised real-world sites. Instead they provide weather information representing a rectangular gridbox (usually kilometres in size). Even after post-processing and bias correction, area-averaged information is usually not optimal for specific sites. Prior work on site optimised forecasts has focused on linear methods, weighted consensus averaging, time-series methods, and others. Recent developments in machine learning (ML) have prompted increasing interest in applying ML as a novel approach towards this problem. In this study, we investigate the feasibility of optimising forecasts at sites by adopting the popular machine learning model gradient boosting decision tree, supported by the Python version of the XGBoost package. Regression trees have been trained with historical NWP and site observations as training data, aimed at predicting temperature and dew point at multiple site locations across Australia. We developed a working ML framework, named 'Multi-SiteBoost' and initial testing results show a significant improvement compared with gridded values from bias-corrected NWP models. The improvement from XGBoost is found to be comparable with non-ML methods reported in literature. With the insights provided by SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), this study also tests various approaches to understand the ML predictions and increase the reliability of the forecasts generated by ML.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2024.
Builds on
8 of 35 references.
References · 8
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2018Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensemblescited by 279
- 2019InterpretML: A Unified Framework for Machine Learning Interpretabilitycited by 243
- 2022Domino: Discovering Systematic Errors with Cross-Modal Embeddingscited by 155
- 2021The Spotlight: A General Method for Discovering Systematic Errors in Deep Learning Modelscited by 63
- 2019Can You Trust This Prediction? Auditing Pointwise Reliability After Learningcited by 28
- 2019Tutorial: Safe and Reliable Machine Learningcited by 22
- 2019Comparison of statistical post-processing methods for probabilistic NWP forecasts of solar radiationcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.