On the Efficiency and Robustness of Vibration-based Foundation Models for IoT Sensing: A Case Study
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper demonstrates the potential of vibration-based Foundation Models (FMs), pre-trained with unlabeled sensing data, to improve the robustness of run-time inference in (a class of) IoT applications. A case study is presented featuring a vehicle classification application using acoustic and seismic sensing. The work is motivated by the success of foundation models in the areas of natural language processing and computer vision, leading to generalizations of the FM concept to other domains as well, where significant amounts of unlabeled data exist that can be used for self-supervised pre-training. One such domain is IoT applications. Foundation models for selected sensing modalities in the IoT domain can be pre-trained in an environment-agnostic fashion using available unlabeled sensor data and then fine-tuned to the deployment at hand using a small amount of labeled data. The paper shows that the pre-training/fine-tuning approach improves the robustness of downstream inference and facilitates adaptation to different environmental conditions. More specifically, we present a case study in a real-world setting to evaluate a simple (vibration-based) FM-like model, called FOCAL, demonstrating its superior robustness and adaptation, compared to conventional supervised deep neural networks (DNNs). We also demonstrate its superior convergence over supervised solutions. Our findings highlight the advantages of vibration-based FMs (and FM-inspired selfsupervised models in general) in terms of inference robustness, runtime efficiency, and model adaptation (via fine-tuning) in resource-limited IoT settings.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2024.
Builds on
25 of 41 references.
References · 25
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
13 more
- 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,610
- 2019Contrastive Multiview Codingcited by 1,297
- 2020Graph Contrastive Learning with Augmentationscited by 1,203
- 2021TS2Vec: Towards Universal Representation of Time Seriescited by 463
- 2021Unsupervised Representation Learning for Time Series with Temporal Neighborhood Codingcited by 223
- 2020Self-Supervised Learning for Domain Adaptation on Point-Cloudscited by 99
- 2023On the Opportunities and Challenges of Foundation Models for Geospatial Artificial Intelligencecited by 88
- 2016DeepSense: A Unified Deep Learning Framework for Time-Series Mobile Sensing Data Processingcited by 84
- 2019Self-supervised Domain Adaptation for Computer Vision Taskscited by 58
- 2022Geometric Multimodal Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 40
- 2023FOCAL: Contrastive Learning for Multimodal Time-Series Sensing Signals in Factorized Orthogonal Latent Spacecited by 31
- 2022Deep Learning on Multimodal Sensor Data at the Wireless Edge for Vehicular Networkcited by 15
- 2018FastDeepIoT: Towards Understanding and Optimizing Neural Network Execution Time on Mobile and Embedded Devicescited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025A Survey of Foundation Models for IoT: Taxonomy and Criteria-Based Analysiscited by 5
- 2025Responsive DNN Adaptation for Video Analytics against Environment Shift via Hierarchical Mobile-Cloud Collaborationscited by 0
- 2025RARR : Robust Real-World Activity Recognition with Vibration by Scavenging Near-Surface Audio Onlinecited by 0
- 2026Agentic Driving Coach: Robustness and Determinism of Agentic AI-Powered Human-in-the-Loop Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 0
- 2026Agentic Driving Coach: Robustness and Determinism of Agentic AI-Powered Human-in-the-Loop Cyber-Physical Systems13 Apr 2026
- 2025RARR : Robust Real-World Activity Recognition with Vibration by Scavenging Near-Surface Audio Online28 Aug 2025
- 2025A Survey of Foundation Models for IoT: Taxonomy and Criteria-Based Analysis13 Jun 2025
- 2025Responsive DNN Adaptation for Video Analytics against Environment Shift via Hierarchical Mobile-Cloud Collaborations30 Apr 2025