Adversarial Combinatorial Bandits with Switching Costs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the problem of adversarial combinatorial bandit with a switching cost λ for a switch of each selected arm in each round, considering both the bandit feedback and semi-bandit feedback settings. In the oblivious adversarial case with K base arms and time horizon T, we derive lower bounds for the minimax regret and design algorithms to approach them. To prove these lower bounds, we design stochastic loss sequences for both feedback settings, building on an idea from previous work in Dekel et al. (2014). The lower bound for bandit feedback is tildeOmegabig( (λ K)^frac13 (TI)^frac23big) while that for semi-bandit feedback is tildeOmegabig( (λ K I)^frac13 T^frac23big) where I is the number of base arms in the combinatorial arm played in each round. To approach these lower bounds, we design algorithms that operate in batches by dividing the time horizon into batches to restrict the number of switches between actions. For the bandit feedback setting, where only the total loss of the combinatorial arm is observed, we introduce the Batched-Exp2 algorithm which achieves a regret upper bound of tildeObig((λ K)^frac13T^frac23I^frac43big) as T tends to infinity. In the semi-bandit feedback setting, where all losses for the combinatorial arm are observed, we propose the Batched-BROAD algorithm which achieves a regret upper bound of tildeObig( (λ K)^frac13 (TI)^frac23big).
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2024.
Builds on
4 of 16 references.
References · 4
- 2018More Adaptive Algorithms for Adversarial Banditscited by 114
- 2019Beating Stochastic and Adversarial Semi-bandits Optimally and Simultaneouslycited by 53
- 2013Bandits with Switching Costs: T^{2/3} Regretcited by 38
- 2021An Algorithm for Stochastic and Adversarial Bandits with Switching Costscited by 18
Built on by
Not cited yet.