Extremum-Seeking Action Selection for Accelerating Policy Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement learning for control over continuous spaces typically uses high-entropy stochastic policies, such as Gaussian distributions, for local exploration and estimating policy gradient to optimize performance. Many robotic control problems deal with complex unstable dynamics, where applying actions that are off the feasible control manifolds can quickly lead to undesirable divergence. In such cases, most samples taken from the ambient action space generate low-value trajectories that hardly contribute to policy improvement, resulting in slow or failed learning. We propose to improve action selection in this model-free RL setting by introducing additional adaptive control steps based on Extremum-Seeking Control (ESC). On each action sampled from stochastic policies, we apply sinusoidal perturbations and query for estimated Q-values as the response signal. Based on ESC, we then dynamically improve the sampled actions to be closer to nearby optima before applying them to the environment. Our methods can be easily added in standard policy optimization to improve learning efficiency, which we demonstrate in various control learning environments.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2024.
Builds on
26 of 40 references.
References · 26
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
- 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
- 2018QT-Opt: Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Based Robotic Manipulationcited by 730
- 2017Noisy Networks for Explorationcited by 262
- 2020Learning Agile Robotic Locomotion Skills by Imitating Animalscited by 229
- 2021How to Train Your Robot with Deep Reinforcement Learning; Lessons We've Learnedcited by 201
- 2020Implementation Matters in Deep Policy Gradients: A Case Study on PPO and TRPOcited by 184
- 2019MAVEN: Multi-Agent Variational Explorationcited by 181
14 more
- 2017Parameter Space Noise for Explorationcited by 158
- 2020Learning to Utilize Shaping Rewards: A New Approach of Reward Shapingcited by 112
- 2017Improving Exploration in Evolution Strategies for Deep Reinforcement Learning via a Population of Novelty-Seeking Agentscited by 107
- 2021Reinforcement Learning for Robust Parameterized Locomotion Control of Bipedal Robotscited by 95
- 2021A Survey of Exploration Methods in Reinforcement Learningcited by 68
- 2020Deep Drone Acrobaticscited by 66
- 2022Unpacking Reward Shaping: Understanding the Benefits of Reward Engineering on Sample Complexitycited by 59
- 2020Revisiting Design Choices in Proximal Policy Optimizationcited by 38
- 2021Adaptive-Control-Oriented Meta-Learning for Nonlinear Systemscited by 38
- 2021Stabilizing Neural Control Using Self-Learned Almost Lyapunov Criticscited by 33
- 2023Iterative Reachability Estimation for Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 33
- 2023Solving Stabilize-Avoid Optimal Control via Epigraph Form and Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 24
- 2018Dual Policy Iterationcited by 22
- 2021Online Algorithms and Policies Using Adaptive and Machine Learning Approachescited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.