mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CoUDA: Coherence Evaluation via Unified Data Augmentation

arXiv 2404.00681 ↗First posted 31 Mar 2024cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Coherence evaluation aims to assess the organization and structure of a discourse, which remains challenging even in the era of large language models. Due to the scarcity of annotated data, data augmentation is commonly used for training coherence evaluation models. However, previous augmentations for this task primarily rely on heuristic rules, lacking designing criteria as guidance. In this paper, we take inspiration from linguistic theory of discourse structure, and propose a data augmentation framework named CoUDA. CoUDA breaks down discourse coherence into global and local aspects, and designs augmentation strategies for both aspects, respectively. Especially for local coherence, we propose a novel generative strategy for constructing augmentation samples, which involves post-pretraining a generative model and applying two controlling mechanisms to control the difficulty of generated samples. During inference, CoUDA also jointly evaluates both global and local aspects to comprehensively assess the overall coherence of a discourse. Extensive experiments in coherence evaluation show that, with only 233M parameters, CoUDA achieves state-of-the-art performance in both pointwise scoring and pairwise ranking tasks, even surpassing recent GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 based metrics.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2024.

Builds on

19 of 34 references.

References · 19

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,790
  3. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  4. 2019PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 1,102
  5. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,085
  6. 2016Abstractive Text Summarization Using Sequence-to-Sequence RNNs and Beyondcited by 812
  7. 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 807
  8. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 722
  9. 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 674
  10. 2023Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Studycited by 422
  11. 2022Towards a Unified Multi-Dimensional Evaluator for Text Generationcited by 264
  12. 2021QuestEval: Summarization Asks for Fact-based Evaluationcited by 244
7 more
  1. 2022DiscoScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT and Discourse Coherencecited by 36
  2. 2016Neural Net Models for Open-Domain Discourse Coherencecited by 23
  3. 2019A Unified Neural Coherence Modelcited by 19
  4. 2021Evaluating Document Coherence Modellingcited by 8
  5. 2021Rethinking Self-Supervision Objectives for Generalizable Coherence Modelingcited by 8
  6. 2020Evaluating Text Coherence at Sentence and Paragraph Levelscited by 7
  7. 2022How to Find Strong Summary Coherence Measures? A Toolbox and a Comparative Study for Summary Coherence Measure Evaluationcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.