mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Rethinking Self-Supervision Objectives for Generalizable Coherence Modeling

arXiv 2110.07198 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2021cs.CLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Given the claims of improved text generation quality across various pre-trained neural models, we consider the coherence evaluation of machine generated text to be one of the principal applications of coherence models that needs to be investigated. Prior work in neural coherence modeling has primarily focused on devising new architectures for solving the permuted document task. We instead use a basic model architecture and show significant improvements over state of the art within the same training regime. We then design a harder self-supervision objective by increasing the ratio of negative samples within a contrastive learning setup, and enhance the model further through automatic hard negative mining coupled with a large global negative queue encoded by a momentum encoder. We show empirically that increasing the density of negative samples improves the basic model, and using a global negative queue further improves and stabilizes the model while training with hard negative samples. We evaluate the coherence model on task-independent test sets that resemble real-world applications and show significant improvements in coherence evaluations of downstream tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2021.

Builds on

31 of 58 references.

References · 31

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  4. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  5. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  6. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
  7. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,811
  8. 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,290
  9. 2019Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Contextcited by 1,850
  10. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
  11. 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,049
  12. 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 849
19 more
  1. 2019DialoGPT: Large-Scale Generative Pre-training for Conversational Response Generationcited by 842
  2. 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 674
  3. 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Contrastive Unsupervised Representation Learningcited by 530
  4. 2017Supervised Learning of Universal Sentence Representations from Natural Language Inference Datacited by 432
  5. 2017A Deep Reinforced Model for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 365
  6. 2020A Simple Language Model for Task-Oriented Dialoguecited by 332
  7. 2020Embedding-based Retrieval in Facebook Searchcited by 156
  8. 2018Achieving Human Parity on Automatic Chinese to English News Translationcited by 119
  9. 2018Has Machine Translation Achieved Human Parity? A Case for Document-level Evaluationcited by 88
  10. 2020Hard negative examples are hard, but usefulcited by 82
  11. 2020On Mutual Information in Contrastive Learning for Visual Representationscited by 54
  12. 2018Deep Communicating Agents for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 50
  13. 2019An Entity-Driven Framework for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 25
  14. 2016Neural Net Models for Open-Domain Discourse Coherencecited by 23
  15. 2017Generative Adversarial Network for Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 23
  16. 2019A Cross-Domain Transferable Neural Coherence Modelcited by 19
  17. 2019A Unified Neural Coherence Modelcited by 19
  18. 2018Coherence Modeling of Asynchronous Conversations: A Neural Entity Grid Approachcited by 14
  19. 2021Evaluating Document Coherence Modellingcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 1.

8 papers.