mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LLMs as Writing Assistants: Exploring Perspectives on Sense of Ownership and Reasoning

arXiv 2404.00027 ↗First posted 20 Mar 2024cs.HC cs.AI cs.CLcited by 12

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Sense of ownership in writing confines our investment of thoughts, time, and contribution, leading to attachment to the output. However, using writing assistants introduces a mental dilemma, as some content isn't directly our creation. For instance, we tend to credit Large Language Models (LLMs) more in creative tasks, even though all tasks are equal for them. Additionally, while we may not claim complete ownership of LLM-generated content, we freely claim authorship. We conduct a short survey to examine these issues and understand underlying cognitive processes in order to gain a better knowledge of human-computer interaction in writing and improve writing aid systems.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 3 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2024.

Builds on

3 of 25 references.

References · 3

  1. 2023Evaluating Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 202
  2. 2023Large Language Models as Tax Attorneys: A Case Study in Legal Capabilities Emergencecited by 42
  3. 2023Inspo: Writing with Crowds Alongside AIcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Where Do I 'Add the Egg'?: Exploring Agency and Ownership in AI Creative Co-Writing Systems
  2. 2024Can AI writing be salvaged? Mitigating Idiosyncrasies and Improving Human-AI Alignment in the Writing Process through Edits
  3. 2026Human Thinking under Plural LLM Assistance: Mathematical Problem Solving and Open-Ended Writing
  4. 2025Prototypical Human-AI Collaboration Behaviors from LLM-Assisted Writing in the Wild
  5. 2024From Test-Taking to Test-Making: Examining LLM Authoring of Commonsense Assessment Items
  6. 2026Who Owns Creativity and Who Does the Work? Trade-offs in LLM-Supported Research Ideation
  7. 2026The Storyteller in the Model: Narrative Pattern Inheritance, Escalation Dynamics, and Alignment Governance in LLMs
  8. 2024It Cannot Be Right If It Was Written by AI: On Lawyers' Preferences of Documents Perceived as Authored by an LLM vs a Human