Large Language Model based Situational Dialogues for Second Language Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In second language learning, scenario-based conversation practice is important for language learners to achieve fluency in speaking, but students often lack sufficient opportunities to practice their conversational skills with qualified instructors or native speakers. To bridge this gap, we propose situational dialogue models for students to engage in conversational practice. Our situational dialogue models are fine-tuned on large language models (LLMs), with the aim of combining the engaging nature of an open-ended conversation with the focused practice of scenario-based tasks. Leveraging the generalization capabilities of LLMs, we demonstrate that our situational dialogue models perform effectively not only on training topics but also on topics not encountered during training. This offers a promising solution to support a wide range of conversational topics without extensive manual work. Additionally, research in the field of dialogue systems still lacks reliable automatic evaluation metrics, leading to human evaluation as the gold standard (Smith et al., 2022), which is typically expensive. To address the limitations of existing evaluation methods, we present a novel automatic evaluation method that employs fine-tuned LLMs to efficiently and effectively assess the performance of situational dialogue models.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Mar 2024.
Builds on
12 of 34 references.
References · 12
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
- 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,470
- 2016How NOT To Evaluate Your Dialogue System: An Empirical Study of Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Dialogue Response Generationcited by 356
- 2017Towards an Automatic Turing Test: Learning to Evaluate Dialogue Responsescited by 98
- 2019ACUTE-EVAL: Improved Dialogue Evaluation with Optimized Questions and Multi-turn Comparisonscited by 83
- 2022Human Evaluation of Conversations is an Open Problem: comparing the sensitivity of various methods for evaluating dialogue agentscited by 62
- 2023Prompted LLMs as Chatbot Modules for Long Open-domain Conversationcited by 61
- 2019Approximating Interactive Human Evaluation with Self-Play for Open-Domain Dialog Systemscited by 42
- 2023FIREBALL: A Dataset of Dungeons and Dragons Actual-Play with Structured Game State Informationcited by 18
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.