mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluating Explanatory Capabilities of Machine Learning Models in Medical Diagnostics: A Human-in-the-Loop Approach

arXiv 2403.19820 ↗First posted 28 Mar 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper presents a comprehensive study on the evaluation of explanatory capabilities of machine learning models, with a focus on Decision Trees, Random Forest and XGBoost models using a pancreatic cancer dataset. We use Human-in-the-Loop related techniques and medical guidelines as a source of domain knowledge to establish the importance of the different features that are relevant to establish a pancreatic cancer treatment. These features are not only used as a dimensionality reduction approach for the machine learning models, but also as way to evaluate the explainability capabilities of the different models using agnostic and non-agnostic explainability techniques. To facilitate interpretation of explanatory results, we propose the use of similarity measures such as the Weighted Jaccard Similarity coefficient. The goal is to not only select the best performing model but also the one that can best explain its conclusions and aligns with human domain knowledge.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2024.

Builds on

22 of 70 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  4. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  5. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 716
  6. 2018Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 508
  7. 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 443
  8. 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 440
  9. 2016European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation"cited by 343
  10. 2017Methods for Interpreting and Understanding Deep Neural Networkscited by 342
  11. 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 310
  12. 2019Explanations can be manipulated and geometry is to blamecited by 215
10 more
  1. 2019Explainable Machine Learning in Deploymentcited by 210
  2. 2017What do we need to build explainable AI systems for the medical domain?cited by 127
  3. 2020Ground Truth Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations with CLEVR-XAIcited by 125
  4. 2020Reliable Post hoc Explanations: Modeling Uncertainty in Explainabilitycited by 125
  5. 2019A Comparative Analysis of XGBoostcited by 80
  6. 2019DLIME: A Deterministic Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations Approach for Computer-Aided Diagnosis Systemscited by 59
  7. 2019Unbiased Measurement of Feature Importance in Tree-Based Methodscited by 30
  8. 2019"Why Should You Trust My Explanation?" Understanding Uncertainty in LIME Explanationscited by 7
  9. 2021Individual Explanations in Machine Learning Models: A Survey for Practitionerscited by 6
  10. 2014Consistent Weighted Sampling Made Fast, Small, and Easycited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.