mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MMCert: Provable Defense against Adversarial Attacks to Multi-modal Models

arXiv 2403.19080 ↗First posted 28 Mar 2024cs.CV cs.CRcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Different from a unimodal model whose input is from a single modality, the input (called multi-modal input) of a multi-modal model is from multiple modalities such as image, 3D points, audio, text, etc. Similar to unimodal models, many existing studies show that a multi-modal model is also vulnerable to adversarial perturbation, where an attacker could add small perturbation to all modalities of a multi-modal input such that the multi-modal model makes incorrect predictions for it. Existing certified defenses are mostly designed for unimodal models, which achieve sub-optimal certified robustness guarantees when extended to multi-modal models as shown in our experimental results. In our work, we propose MMCert, the first certified defense against adversarial attacks to a multi-modal model. We derive a lower bound on the performance of our MMCert under arbitrary adversarial attacks with bounded perturbations to both modalities (e.g., in the context of auto-driving, we bound the number of changed pixels in both RGB image and depth image). We evaluate our MMCert using two benchmark datasets: one for the multi-modal road segmentation task and the other for the multi-modal emotion recognition task. Moreover, we compare our MMCert with a state-of-the-art certified defense extended from unimodal models. Our experimental results show that our MMCert outperforms the baseline.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2024.

Builds on

43 of 60 references.

References · 43

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  3. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,489
  4. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
  5. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  6. 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 774
  7. 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 739
  8. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
  9. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
  10. 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 564
  11. 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
  12. 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 462
31 more
  1. 2021Multi-Modal Fusion Transformer for End-to-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 372
  2. 2018On the Effectiveness of Interval Bound Propagation for Training Verifiably Robust Modelscited by 322
  3. 2019EPIC-Fusion: Audio-Visual Temporal Binding for Egocentric Action Recognitioncited by 226
  4. 2022DeepFusion: Lidar-Camera Deep Fusion for Multi-Modal 3D Object Detectioncited by 224
  5. 2018Adversarial Risk and the Dangers of Evaluating Against Weak Attackscited by 221
  6. 2016MOSI: Multimodal Corpus of Sentiment Intensity and Subjectivity Analysis in Online Opinion Videoscited by 193
  7. 2022Towards Adversarial Attack on Vision-Language Pre-training Modelscited by 142
  8. 2019Iterative Answer Prediction with Pointer-Augmented Multimodal Transformers for TextVQAcited by 107
  9. 2019Cycle-Consistency for Robust Visual Question Answeringcited by 105
  10. 2020Certified Defenses for Adversarial Patchescited by 100
  11. 2016MultiNet: Real-time Joint Semantic Reasoning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 90
  12. 2020Intrinsic Certified Robustness of Bagging against Data Poisoning Attackscited by 90
  13. 2020SAFER: A Structure-free Approach for Certified Robustness to Adversarial Word Substitutionscited by 72
  14. 2020SNE-RoadSeg: Incorporating Surface Normal Information into Semantic Segmentation for Accurate Freespace Detectioncited by 66
  15. 2021PatchCleanser: Certifiably Robust Defense against Adversarial Patches for Any Image Classifiercited by 63
  16. 2019Robustness Certificates for Sparse Adversarial Attacks by Randomized Ablationcited by 59
  17. 2021Certified Robustness to Text Adversarial Attacks by Randomized [MASK]cited by 57
  18. 2019Certified Robustness for Top-k Predictions against Adversarial Perturbations via Randomized Smoothingcited by 54
  19. 2021Scalable Certified Segmentation via Randomized Smoothingcited by 35
  20. 2020Drift with Devil: Security of Multi-Sensor Fusion based Localization in High-Level Autonomous Driving under GPS Spoofing (Extended Version)cited by 25
  21. 2021Can audio-visual integration strengthen robustness under multimodal attacks?cited by 23
  22. 2022Self-attention fusion for audiovisual emotion recognition with incomplete datacited by 22
  23. 2022VQA-GNN: Reasoning with Multimodal Knowledge via Graph Neural Networks for Visual Question Answeringcited by 22
  24. 2022End-to-end Autonomous Driving with Semantic Depth Cloud Mapping and Multi-agentcited by 21
  25. 2022Defending Multimodal Fusion Models against Single-Source Adversariescited by 20
  26. 2020Gated Mechanism for Attention Based Multimodal Sentiment Analysiscited by 17
  27. 2020Almost Tight L0-norm Certified Robustness of Top-k Predictions against Adversarial Perturbationscited by 16
  28. 2023TextGuard: Provable Defense against Backdoor Attacks on Text Classificationcited by 14
  29. 2019On Single Source Robustness in Deep Fusion Modelscited by 12
  30. 2022MultiGuard: Provably Robust Multi-label Classification against Adversarial Examplescited by 9
  31. 2023PointCert: Point Cloud Classification with Deterministic Certified Robustness Guaranteescited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.