Equity in Healthcare: Analyzing Disparities in Machine Learning Predictions of Diabetic Patient Readmissions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study investigates how machine learning (ML) models can predict hospital readmissions for diabetic patients fairly and accurately across different demographics (age, gender, race). We compared models like Deep Learning, Generalized Linear Models, Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM), and Naive Bayes. GBM stood out with an F1-score of 84.3% and accuracy of 82.2%, accurately predicting readmissions across demographics. A fairness analysis was conducted across all the models. GBM minimized disparities in predictions, achieving balanced results across genders and races. It showed low False Discovery Rates (FDR) (6-7%) and False Positive Rates (FPR) (5%) for both genders. Additionally, FDRs remained low for racial groups, such as African Americans (8%) and Asians (7%). Similarly, FPRs were consistent across age groups (4%) for both patients under 40 and those above 40, indicating its precision and ability to reduce bias. These findings emphasize the importance of choosing ML models carefully to ensure both accuracy and fairness for all patients. By showcasing effectiveness of various models with fairness metrics, this study promotes personalized medicine and the need for fair ML algorithms in healthcare. This can ultimately reduce disparities and improve outcomes for diabetic patients of all backgrounds.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2024.
Builds on
13 of 38 references.
References · 13
- 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
- 2018Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?cited by 262
- 2019The What-If Tool: Interactive Probing of Machine Learning Modelscited by 207
- 2018Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkitcited by 145
- 2020Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 143
- 2023A Survey on Intersectional Fairness in Machine Learning: Notions, Mitigation, and Challengescited by 41
- 2022A Comprehensive Empirical Study of Bias Mitigation Methods for Machine Learning Classifierscited by 30
- 2022Bias in Machine Learning Models Can Be Significantly Mitigated by Careful Training: Evidence from Neuroimaging Studiescited by 14
- 2023Towards Fair Machine Learning Software: Understanding and Addressing Model Bias Through Counterfactual Thinkingcited by 14
- 2022Bias and unfairness in machine learning models: a systematic literature reviewcited by 7
- 2023Fairness in Machine Learning meets with Equity in Healthcarecited by 5
- 2023Connecting Fairness in Machine Learning with Public Health Equitycited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.