Connecting Fairness in Machine Learning with Public Health Equity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning (ML) has become a critical tool in public health, offering the potential to improve population health, diagnosis, treatment selection, and health system efficiency. However, biases in data and model design can result in disparities for certain protected groups and amplify existing inequalities in healthcare. To address this challenge, this study summarizes seminal literature on ML fairness and presents a framework for identifying and mitigating biases in the data and model. The framework provides guidance on incorporating fairness into different stages of the typical ML pipeline, such as data processing, model design, deployment, and evaluation. To illustrate the impact of biases in data on ML models, we present examples that demonstrate how systematic biases can be amplified through model predictions. These case studies suggest how the framework can be used to prevent these biases and highlight the need for fair and equitable ML models in public health. This work aims to inform and guide the use of ML in public health towards a more ethical and equitable outcome for all populations.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2023.
Builds on
8 of 36 references.
References · 8
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
- 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 369
- 2016Adversarial Feature Learningcited by 350
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 194
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Exploring Bias and Prediction Metrics to Characterise the Fairness of Machine Learning for Equity-Centered Public Health Decision-Making: A Narrative Reviewcited by 6
- 2025Machine Learning and Public Health: Identifying and Mitigating Algorithmic Bias through a Systematic Reviewcited by 2
- 2024Equity in Healthcare: Analyzing Disparities in Machine Learning Predictions of Diabetic Patient Readmissionscited by 0
- 2024Disparate Model Performance and Stability in Machine Learning Clinical Support for Diabetes and Heart Diseasescited by 0
- 2025Machine Learning and Public Health: Identifying and Mitigating Algorithmic Bias through a Systematic Review16 Oct 2025
- 2024Disparate Model Performance and Stability in Machine Learning Clinical Support for Diabetes and Heart Diseases27 Dec 2024
- 2024Exploring Bias and Prediction Metrics to Characterise the Fairness of Machine Learning for Equity-Centered Public Health Decision-Making: A Narrative Review23 Aug 2024
- 2024Equity in Healthcare: Analyzing Disparities in Machine Learning Predictions of Diabetic Patient Readmissions27 Mar 2024