mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Grounding Language Plans in Demonstrations Through Counterfactual Perturbations

arXiv 2403.17124 ↗First posted 25 Mar 2024cs.RO cs.AI cs.CLcited by 11

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Grounding the common-sense reasoning of Large Language Models (LLMs) in physical domains remains a pivotal yet unsolved problem for embodied AI. Whereas prior works have focused on leveraging LLMs directly for planning in symbolic spaces, this work uses LLMs to guide the search of task structures and constraints implicit in multi-step demonstrations. Specifically, we borrow from manipulation planning literature the concept of mode families, which group robot configurations by specific motion constraints, to serve as an abstraction layer between the high-level language representations of an LLM and the low-level physical trajectories of a robot. By replaying a few human demonstrations with synthetic perturbations, we generate coverage over the demonstrations' state space with additional successful executions as well as counterfactuals that fail the task. Our explanation-based learning framework trains an end-to-end differentiable neural network to predict successful trajectories from failures and as a by-product learns classifiers that ground low-level states and images in mode families without dense labeling. The learned grounding classifiers can further be used to translate language plans into reactive policies in the physical domain in an interpretable manner. We show our approach improves the interpretability and reactivity of imitation learning through 2D navigation and simulated and real robot manipulation tasks. Website: https://yanweiw.github.io/glide

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 28 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2024.

Builds on

28 of 41 references.

References · 28

  1. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  2. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
  3. 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,081
  4. 2023Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardwarecited by 1,490
  5. 2022Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agentscited by 1,029
  6. 2023VoxPoser: Composable 3D Value Maps for Robotic Manipulation with Language Modelscited by 733
  7. 2023LLM+P: Empowering Large Language Models with Optimal Planning Proficiencycited by 496
  8. 2020robosuite: A Modular Simulation Framework and Benchmark for Robot Learningcited by 484
  9. 2024Mobile ALOHA: Learning Bimanual Mobile Manipulation with Low-Cost Whole-Body Teleoperationcited by 377
  10. 2024Universal Manipulation Interface: In-The-Wild Robot Teaching Without In-The-Wild Robotscited by 373
  11. 2020Integrated Task and Motion Planningcited by 281
  12. 2023Text2Motion: From Natural Language Instructions to Feasible Planscited by 223
16 more
  1. 2022Pre-Trained Language Models for Interactive Decision-Makingcited by 220
  2. 2022Interactive Language: Talking to Robots in Real Timecited by 217
  3. 2020Language Conditioned Imitation Learning over Unstructured Datacited by 208
  4. 2016Modular Multitask Reinforcement Learning with Policy Sketchescited by 200
  5. 2023GELLO: A General, Low-Cost, and Intuitive Teleoperation Framework for Robot Manipulatorscited by 180
  6. 2019Language as an Abstraction for Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 138
  7. 2020A survey of algorithmic recourse: definitions, formulations, solutions, and prospectscited by 118
  8. 2021Skill Induction and Planning with Latent Languagecited by 99
  9. 2020Instance-based Counterfactual Explanations for Time Series Classificationcited by 64
  10. 2023AirExo: Low-Cost Exoskeletons for Learning Whole-Arm Manipulation in the Wildcited by 46
  11. 2022LISA: Learning Interpretable Skill Abstractions from Languagecited by 30
  12. 2015Alignment-based compositional semantics for instruction followingcited by 21
  13. 2022Temporal Logic Imitation: Learning Plan-Satisficing Motion Policies from Demonstrationscited by 10
  14. 2022Visual Pre-training for Navigation: What Can We Learn from Noise?cited by 8
  15. 2021Learning and Planning for Temporally Extended Tasks in Unknown Environmentscited by 7
  16. 2023Learning Rational Subgoals from Demonstrations and Instructionscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Learning Compositional Behaviors from Demonstration and Language
  2. 2025Reinforced Embodied Planning with Verifiable Reward for Real-World Robotic Manipulation
  3. 2026Language Movement Primitives: Grounding Language Models in Robot Motion
  4. 2026PLanAR: Planning-Language-Grounded Agentic Reasoning for Robot Manipulation
  5. 2025Plan Verification for LLM-Based Embodied Task Completion Agents
  6. 2026Spatially Grounded Long-Horizon Task Planning in the Wild
  7. 2025From Grounding to Manipulation: Case Studies of Foundation Model Integration in Embodied Robotic Systems
  8. 2022Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Models