mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sample and Communication Efficient Fully Decentralized MARL Policy Evaluation via a New Approach: Local TD update

arXiv 2403.15935 ↗First posted 23 Mar 2024cs.LG cs.MAcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In actor-critic framework for fully decentralized multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), one of the key components is the MARL policy evaluation (PE) problem, where a set of N agents work cooperatively to evaluate the value function of the global states for a given policy through communicating with their neighbors. In MARL-PE, a critical challenge is how to lower the sample and communication complexities, which are defined as the number of training samples and communication rounds needed to converge to some ε-stationary point. To lower communication complexity in MARL-PE, a "natural'' idea is to perform multiple local TD-update steps between each consecutive rounds of communication to reduce the communication frequency. However, the validity of the local TD-update approach remains unclear due to the potential "agent-drift'' phenomenon resulting from heterogeneous rewards across agents in general. This leads to an interesting open question: Can the local TD-update approach entail low sample and communication complexities? In this paper, we make the first attempt to answer this fundamental question. We focus on the setting of MARL-PE with average reward, which is motivated by many multi-agent network optimization problems. Our theoretical and experimental results confirm that allowing multiple local TD-update steps is indeed an effective approach in lowering the sample and communication complexities of MARL-PE compared to consensus-based MARL-PE algorithms. Specifically, the local TD-update steps between two consecutive communication rounds can be as large as O(1/ε1/2log(1/ε)) in order to converge to an ε-stationary point of MARL-PE. Moreover, we show theoretically that in order to reach the optimal sample complexity, the communication complexity of local TD-update approach is O(1/ε1/2log(1/ε)).

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2024.

Builds on

16 of 35 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
  2. 2019Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Selective Overview of Theories and Algorithmscited by 555
  3. 2017Can Decentralized Algorithms Outperform Centralized Algorithms? A Case Study for Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 496
  4. 2016Safe, Multi-Agent, Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 301
  5. 2018A Finite Time Analysis of Temporal Difference Learning With Linear Function Approximationcited by 225
  6. 2018Fully Decentralized Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Networked Agentscited by 189
  7. 2019Finite-Time Error Bounds For Linear Stochastic Approximation and TD Learningcited by 165
  8. 2019Learning to Schedule Communication in Multi-agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 89
  9. 2020Scalable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Networked Systems with Average Rewardcited by 46
  10. 2018Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning via Double Averaging Primal-Dual Optimizationcited by 40
  11. 2021Sample and Communication-Efficient Decentralized Actor-Critic Algorithms with Finite-Time Analysiscited by 25
  12. 2013Distributed Policy Evaluation Under Multiple Behavior Strategiescited by 17
4 more
  1. 2019A Communication-Efficient Multi-Agent Actor-Critic Algorithm for Distributed Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
  2. 2019Finite-Time Performance of Distributed Temporal Difference Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 14
  3. 2018Communication-Efficient Policy Gradient Methods for Distributed Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
  4. 2018Primal-Dual Algorithm for Distributed Reinforcement Learning: Distributed GTDcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

3 papers.