Extracting Human Attention through Crowdsourced Patch Labeling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In image classification, a significant problem arises from bias in the datasets. When it contains only specific types of images, the classifier begins to rely on shortcuts - simplistic and erroneous rules for decision-making. This leads to high performance on the training dataset but inferior results on new, varied images, as the classifier's generalization capability is reduced. For example, if the images labeled as mustache consist solely of male figures, the model may inadvertently learn to classify images by gender rather than the presence of a mustache. One approach to mitigate such biases is to direct the model's attention toward the target object's location, usually marked using bounding boxes or polygons for annotation. However, collecting such annotations requires substantial time and human effort. Therefore, we propose a novel patch-labeling method that integrates AI assistance with crowdsourcing to capture human attention from images, which can be a viable solution for mitigating bias. Our method consists of two steps. First, we extract the approximate location of a target using a pre-trained saliency detection model supplemented by human verification for accuracy. Then, we determine the human-attentive area in the image by iteratively dividing the image into smaller patches and employing crowdsourcing to ascertain whether each patch can be classified as the target object. We demonstrated the effectiveness of our method in mitigating bias through improved classification accuracy and the refined focus of the model. Also, crowdsourced experiments validate that our method collects human annotation up to 3.4 times faster than annotating object locations with polygons, significantly reducing the need for human resources. We conclude the paper by discussing the advantages of our method in a crowdsourcing context, mainly focusing on aspects of human errors and accessibility.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2024.
Builds on
25 of 65 references.
References · 25
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,967
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
- 2015Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networkscited by 1,323
- 2023Segment Everything Everywhere All at Oncecited by 546
- 2017Zero-Shot Learning -- A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Good, the Bad and the Uglycited by 536
- 2018Learning Not to Learn: Training Deep Neural Networks with Biased Datacited by 255
- 2023Inpaint Anything: Segment Anything Meets Image Inpaintingcited by 233
- 2018Tell Me Where to Look: Guided Attention Inference Networkcited by 168
- 2019Pyramid Feature Attention Network for Saliency detectioncited by 128
13 more
- 2018Turning a Blind Eye: Explicit Removal of Biases and Variation from Deep Neural Network Embeddingscited by 114
- 2023Kandinsky: an Improved Text-to-Image Synthesis with Image Prior and Latent Diffusioncited by 114
- 2016Predicting Human Eye Fixations via an LSTM-based Saliency Attentive Modelcited by 91
- 2022A Whac-A-Mole Dilemma: Shortcuts Come in Multiples Where Mitigating One Amplifies Otherscited by 85
- 2016MOON: A Mixed Objective Optimization Network for the Recognition of Facial Attributescited by 34
- 2017Examining CNN Representations with respect to Dataset Biascited by 27
- 2018A Large-scale Attribute Dataset for Zero-shot Learningcited by 20
- 2021Human Attention in Fine-grained Classificationcited by 20
- 2022Through a fair looking-glass: mitigating bias in image datasetscited by 6
- 2022Efficient Human-in-the-loop System for Guiding DNNs Attentioncited by 4
- 2023Do humans and Convolutional Neural Networks attend to similar areas during scene classification: Effects of task and image typecited by 4
- 2023Self-Supervised One-Shot Learning for Automatic Segmentation of StyleGAN Imagescited by 2
- 2021Computing Touch-Point Ambiguity on Mobile Touchscreens for Modeling Target Selection Timescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.