mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Context Quality Matters in Training Fusion-in-Decoder for Extractive Open-Domain Question Answering

arXiv 2403.14197 ↗First posted 21 Mar 2024cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval

Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval-augmented generation models augment knowledge encoded in a language model by providing additional relevant external knowledge (context) during generation. Although it has been shown that the quantity and quality of context impact the performance of retrieval-augmented generation models during inference, limited research explores how these characteristics affect model training. This paper explores how context quantity and quality during model training affect the performance of Fusion-in-Decoder (FiD), the state-of-the-art retrieval-augmented generation model, in extractive open-domain question answering tasks. Experimental results suggest that FiD models overfit to context quality during training and show suboptimal performance when evaluated on different context quality. Through the experimental results, we also reveal FiD models trained with different context quality have different cross-attention distribution patterns. Specifically, as context quality during training increases, FiD models tend to attend more uniformly to each passage in context. Finally, based on these observations, we propose a method to mitigate overfitting to specific context quality by introducing bias to the cross-attention distribution, which we demonstrate to be effective in improving the performance of FiD models on different context quality.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 30 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2024.

Builds on

30 of 39 references.

References · 30

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  5. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
  6. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
  7. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
  8. 2020Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 1,203
  9. 2022When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memoriescited by 1,103
  10. 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,046
  11. 2022Atlas: Few-shot Learning with Retrieval Augmented Language Modelscited by 940
  12. 2017Reading Wikipedia to Answer Open-Domain Questionscited by 777
18 more
  1. 2019Latent Retrieval for Weakly Supervised Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 691
  2. 2021Retrieval Augmentation Reduces Hallucination in Conversationcited by 691
  3. 2020KILT: a Benchmark for Knowledge Intensive Language Taskscited by 571
  4. 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 568
  5. 2020AmbigQA: Answering Ambiguous Open-domain Questionscited by 385
  6. 2021Entity-Based Knowledge Conflicts in Question Answeringcited by 349
  7. 2020Pretrained Transformers for Text Ranking: BERT and Beyondcited by 266
  8. 2022RealTime QA: What's the Answer Right Now?cited by 239
  9. 2020Distilling Knowledge from Reader to Retriever for Question Answeringcited by 226
  10. 2022Large Language Models with Controllable Working Memorycited by 169
  11. 2021Retrieval Augmented Code Generation and Summarizationcited by 148
  12. 2022Rich Knowledge Sources Bring Complex Knowledge Conflicts: Recalibrating Models to Reflect Conflicting Evidencecited by 142
  13. 2020Look at the First Sentence: Position Bias in Question Answeringcited by 83
  14. 2019Avoiding Reasoning Shortcuts: Adversarial Evaluation, Training, and Model Development for Multi-Hop QAcited by 63
  15. 2022FiD-Light: Efficient and Effective Retrieval-Augmented Text Generationcited by 63
  16. 2018What Makes Reading Comprehension Questions Easier?cited by 59
  17. 2022Synthetic Disinformation Attacks on Automated Fact Verification Systemscited by 44
  18. 2022Passage-Mask: A Learnable Regularization Strategy for Retriever-Reader Modelscited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Adaptive Contrastive Decoding in Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Handling Noisy Contexts
  2. 2024Improving Retrieval Augmented Open-Domain Question-Answering with Vectorized Contexts
  3. 2024RE-RAG: Improving Open-Domain QA Performance and Interpretability with Relevance Estimator in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  4. 2023Learning to Filter Context for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  5. 2026ReFilter: Improving Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Gated Filter
  6. 2024Why does in-context learning fail sometimes? Evaluating in-context learning on open and closed questions
  7. 2024Context Awareness Gate For Retrieval Augmented Generation
  8. 2022Decoupled Context Processing for Context Augmented Language Modeling