mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FissionFusion: Fast Geometric Generation and Hierarchical Souping for Medical Image Analysis

arXiv 2403.13341 ↗First posted 20 Mar 2024cs.CV cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The scarcity of well-annotated medical datasets requires leveraging transfer learning from broader datasets like ImageNet or pre-trained models like CLIP. Model soups averages multiple fine-tuned models aiming to improve performance on In-Domain (ID) tasks and enhance robustness against Out-of-Distribution (OOD) datasets. However, applying these methods to the medical imaging domain faces challenges and results in suboptimal performance. This is primarily due to differences in error surface characteristics that stem from data complexities such as heterogeneity, domain shift, class imbalance, and distributional shifts between training and testing phases. To address this issue, we propose a hierarchical merging approach that involves local and global aggregation of models at various levels based on models' hyperparameter configurations. Furthermore, to alleviate the need for training a large number of models in the hyperparameter search, we introduce a computationally efficient method using a cyclical learning rate scheduler to produce multiple models for aggregation in the weight space. Our method demonstrates significant improvements over the model souping approach across multiple datasets (around 6% gain in HAM10000 and CheXpert datasets) while maintaining low computational costs for model generation and selection. Moreover, we achieve better results on OOD datasets than model soups. The code is available at https://github.com/BioMedIA-MBZUAI/FissionFusion.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2024.

Builds on

19 of 35 references.

References · 19

  1. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
  2. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
  3. 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,423
  4. 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,396
  5. 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,209
  6. 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,120
  7. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
  8. 2021Merging Models with Fisher-Weighted Averagingcited by 621
  9. 2018Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNscited by 588
  10. 2020What is being transferred in transfer learning?cited by 368
  11. 2017Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Full Training or Fine Tuning?cited by 221
  12. 2018Do CIFAR-10 Classifiers Generalize to CIFAR-10?cited by 200
7 more
  1. 2023Model Merging by Uncertainty-Based Gradient Matchingcited by 77
  2. 2022What Makes Transfer Learning Work For Medical Images: Feature Reuse & Other Factorscited by 61
  3. 2021Is it Time to Replace CNNs with Transformers for Medical Images?cited by 60
  4. 2020A scoping review of transfer learning research on medical image analysis using ImageNetcited by 54
  5. 2023Sparse Model Soups: A Recipe for Improved Pruning via Model Averagingcited by 20
  6. 2023FedSoup: Improving Generalization and Personalization in Federated Learning via Selective Model Interpolationcited by 14
  7. 2022Hyperparameter Importance of Quantum Neural Networks Across Small Datasetscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

3 papers.