mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Methods for Generating Drift in Text Streams

arXiv 2403.12328 ↗First posted 18 Mar 2024cs.LG cs.CL cs.IRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Systems and individuals produce data continuously. On the Internet, people share their knowledge, sentiments, and opinions, provide reviews about services and products, and so on. Automatically learning from these textual data can provide insights to organizations and institutions, thus preventing financial impacts, for example. To learn from textual data over time, the machine learning system must account for concept drift. Concept drift is a frequent phenomenon in real-world datasets and corresponds to changes in data distribution over time. For instance, a concept drift occurs when sentiments change or a word's meaning is adjusted over time. Although concept drift is frequent in real-world applications, benchmark datasets with labeled drifts are rare in the literature. To bridge this gap, this paper provides four textual drift generation methods to ease the production of datasets with labeled drifts. These methods were applied to Yelp and Airbnb datasets and tested using incremental classifiers respecting the stream mining paradigm to evaluate their ability to recover from the drifts. Results show that all methods have their performance degraded right after the drifts, and the incremental SVM is the fastest to run and recover the previous performance levels regarding accuracy and Macro F1-Score.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2024.

Builds on

9 of 29 references.

References · 9

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  3. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  4. 2016Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classificationcited by 876
  5. 2020TweetEval: Unified Benchmark and Comparative Evaluation for Tweet Classificationcited by 417
  6. 2016FastText.zip: Compressing text classification modelscited by 335
  7. 2020River: machine learning for streaming data in Pythoncited by 98
  8. 2018Diachronic word embeddings and semantic shifts: a surveycited by 92
  9. 2019ASSED -- A Framework for Identifying Physical Events through Adaptive Social Sensor Data Filteringcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.