mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Safety Analysis of Autonomous Railway Systems: An Introduction to the SACRED Methodology

arXiv 2403.12114 ↗First posted 18 Mar 2024cs.SE cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As the railway industry increasingly seeks to introduce autonomy and machine learning (ML), several questions arise. How can safety be assured for such systems and technologies? What is the applicability of current safety standards within this new technological landscape? What are the key metrics to classify a system as safe? Currently, safety analysis for the railway reflects the failure modes of existing technology; in contrast, the primary concern of analysis of automation is typically average performance. Such purely statistical approaches to measuring ML performance are limited, as they may overlook classes of situations that may occur rarely but in which the function performs consistently poorly. To combat these difficulties we introduce SACRED, a safety methodology for producing an initial safety case and determining important safety metrics for autonomous systems. The development of SACRED is motivated by the proposed GoA-4 light-rail system in Berlin.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2024.

Builds on

2 of 19 references.

References · 2

  1. 2022Guidance on the Safety Assurance of Autonomous Systems in Complex Environments (SACE)cited by 8
  2. 2023Mainline Automatic Train Horn and Brake Performance Metriccited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.

3 papers.