mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Alpha-wolves and Alpha-mammals: Exploring Dictionary Attacks on Iris Recognition Systems

arXiv 2403.12047 ↗First posted 20 Nov 2023cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A dictionary attack in a biometric system entails the use of a small number of strategically generated images or templates to successfully match with a large number of identities, thereby compromising security. We focus on dictionary attacks at the template level, specifically the IrisCodes used in iris recognition systems. We present an hitherto unknown vulnerability wherein we mix IrisCodes using simple bitwise operators to generate alpha-mixtures - alpha-wolves (combining a set of "wolf" samples) and alpha-mammals (combining a set of users selected via search optimization) that increase false matches. We evaluate this vulnerability using the IITD, CASIA-IrisV4-Thousand and Synthetic datasets, and observe that an alpha-wolf (from two wolves) can match upto 71 identities @FMR=0.001%, while an alpha-mammal (from two identities) can match upto 133 other identities @FMR=0.01% on the IITD dataset.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2023.

Builds on

6 of 29 references.

References · 6

  1. 2016Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 4,510
  2. 2020Image Quality Assessment: Unifying Structure and Texture Similaritycited by 792
  3. 2022Deep Learning for Iris Recognition: A Surveycited by 25
  4. 2021Generating Master Faces for Dictionary Attacks with a Network-Assisted Latent Space Evolutioncited by 10
  5. 2022On the (Limited) Generalization of MasterFace Attacks and Its Relation to the Capacity of Face Representationscited by 7
  6. 2022Dictionary Attacks on Speaker Verificationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.