mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Ensuring Safe and High-Quality Outputs: A Guideline Library Approach for Language Models

arXiv 2403.11838 ↗First posted 18 Mar 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit impressive capabilities but also present risks such as biased content generation and privacy issues. One of the current alignment techniques includes principle-driven integration, but it faces challenges arising from the imprecision of manually crafted rules and inadequate risk perception in models without safety training. To address these, we introduce Guide-Align, a two-stage approach. Initially, a safety-trained model identifies potential risks and formulates specific guidelines for various inputs, establishing a comprehensive library of guidelines and a model for input-guidelines retrieval. Subsequently, the retrieval model correlates new inputs with relevant guidelines, which guide LLMs in response generation to ensure safe and high-quality outputs, thereby aligning with human values. An additional optional stage involves fine-tuning a model with well-aligned datasets generated through the process implemented in the second stage. Our method customizes guidelines to accommodate diverse inputs, thereby enhancing the fine-grainedness and comprehensiveness of the guideline library. Furthermore, it incorporates safety expertise from a safety-trained LLM through a lightweight retrieval model. We evaluate our approach on three benchmarks, demonstrating significant improvements in LLM security and quality. Notably, our fine-tuned model, Labrador, even at 13 billion parameters, outperforms GPT-3.5-turbo and surpasses GPT-4 in alignment capabilities.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2024.

Builds on

20 of 35 references.

References · 20

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  3. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  5. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
  6. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
  7. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
  8. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
  9. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,443
  10. 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignmentcited by 1,055
  11. 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 868
  12. 2022Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Modelscited by 832
8 more
  1. 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignmentcited by 686
  2. 2023Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citationscited by 595
  3. 2022Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgementscited by 531
  4. 2023Principle-Driven Self-Alignment of Language Models from Scratch with Minimal Human Supervisioncited by 318
  5. 2023Do-Not-Answer: A Dataset for Evaluating Safeguards in LLMscited by 184
  6. 2021Process for Adapting Language Models to Society (PALMS) with Values-Targeted Datasetscited by 181
  7. 2023MART: Improving LLM Safety with Multi-round Automatic Red-Teamingcited by 163
  8. 2023From Instructions to Intrinsic Human Values -- A Survey of Alignment Goals for Big Modelscited by 45

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.