SETA: Semantic-Aware Token Augmentation for Domain Generalization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Domain generalization (DG) aims to enhance the model robustness against domain shifts without accessing target domains. A prevalent category of methods for DG is data augmentation, which focuses on generating virtual samples to simulate domain shifts. However, existing augmentation techniques in DG are mainly tailored for convolutional neural networks (CNNs), with limited exploration in token-based architectures, i.e., vision transformer (ViT) and multi-layer perceptrons (MLP) models. In this paper, we study the impact of prior CNN-based augmentation methods on token-based models, revealing their performance is suboptimal due to the lack of incentivizing the model to learn holistic shape information. To tackle the issue, we propose the SEmantic-aware Token Augmentation (SETA) method. SETA transforms token features by perturbing local edge cues while preserving global shape features, thereby enhancing the model learning of shape information. To further enhance the generalization ability of the model, we introduce two stylized variants of our method combined with two state-of-the-art style augmentation methods in DG. We provide a theoretical insight into our method, demonstrating its effectiveness in reducing the generalization risk bound. Comprehensive experiments on five benchmarks prove that our method achieves SOTA performances across various ViT and MLP architectures. Our code is available at https://github.com/lingeringlight/SETA.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 70 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2024.
Builds on
70 of 84 references.
References · 70
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
- 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,223
- 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
- 2017Arbitrary Style Transfer in Real-time with Adaptive Instance Normalizationcited by 2,010
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
38 more
- 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,331
- 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,288
- 2017Deep Hashing Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 1,188
- 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,054
- 2017Deeper, Broader and Artier Domain Generalizationcited by 986
- 2016Playing for Data: Ground Truth from Computer Gamescited by 818
- 2021Domain Generalization: A Surveycited by 764
- 2018Recognition in Terra Incognitacited by 658
- 2021Domain Generalization with MixStylecited by 566
- 2021SWAD: Domain Generalization by Seeking Flat Minimacited by 434
- 2020Self-Challenging Improves Cross-Domain Generalizationcited by 426
- 2021A Fourier-based Framework for Domain Generalizationcited by 290
- 2021Global Filter Networks for Image Classificationcited by 260
- 2021Gradient Matching for Domain Generalizationcited by 258
- 2021RobustNet: Improving Domain Generalization in Urban-Scene Segmentation via Instance Selective Whiteningcited by 215
- 2021Ensemble of Averages: Improving Model Selection and Boosting Performance in Domain Generalizationcited by 144
- 2022Domain Generalization by Mutual-Information Regularization with Pre-trained Modelscited by 133
- 2020What shapes feature representations? Exploring datasets, architectures, and trainingcited by 126
- 2022Uncertainty Modeling for Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 125
- 2022Exact Feature Distribution Matching for Arbitrary Style Transfer and Domain Generalizationcited by 122
- 2021Are Convolutional Neural Networks or Transformers more like human vision?cited by 109
- 2018A Kernel Theory of Modern Data Augmentationcited by 106
- 2023Sharpness-Aware Gradient Matching for Domain Generalizationcited by 102
- 2022CLIP-Driven Fine-grained Text-Image Person Re-identificationcited by 79
- 2020Shape-Texture Debiased Neural Network Trainingcited by 76
- 2022Improving Vision Transformers by Revisiting High-frequency Componentscited by 76
- 2022Probable Domain Generalization via Quantile Risk Minimizationcited by 66
- 2022A Broad Study of Pre-training for Domain Generalization and Adaptationcited by 65
- 2021MixStyle Neural Networks for Domain Generalization and Adaptationcited by 64
- 2020Informative Dropout for Robust Representation Learning: A Shape-bias Perspectivecited by 57
- 2023Patch-Mix Transformer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation: A Game Perspectivecited by 54
- 2023StyleAdv: Meta Style Adversarial Training for Cross-Domain Few-Shot Learningcited by 53
- 2021Shape or Texture: Understanding Discriminative Features in CNNscited by 52
- 2022Prompt Vision Transformer for Domain Generalizationcited by 52
- 2023Meta-causal Learning for Single Domain Generalizationcited by 43
- 2021Feature Stylization and Domain-aware Contrastive Learning for Domain Generalizationcited by 40
- 2021Spectral Bias in Practice: The Role of Function Frequency in Generalizationcited by 37
- 2022Learning Domain Invariant Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 36
50 most cited of 70 All 70 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.
3 papers.