mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Texture Edge detection by Patch consensus (TEP)

arXiv 2403.11038 ↗First posted 16 Mar 2024cs.CV cs.NA math.NAcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose Texture Edge detection using Patch consensus (TEP) which is a training-free method to detect the boundary of texture. We propose a new simple way to identify the texture edge location, using the consensus of segmented local patch information. While on the boundary, even using local patch information, the distinction between textures are typically not clear, but using neighbor consensus give a clear idea of the boundary. We utilize local patch, and its response against neighboring regions, to emphasize the similarities and the differences across different textures. The step of segmentation of response further emphasizes the edge location, and the neighborhood voting gives consensus and stabilize the edge detection. We analyze texture as a stationary process to give insight into the patch width parameter verses the quality of edge detection. We derive the necessary condition for textures to be distinguished, and analyze the patch width with respect to the scale of textures. Various experiments are presented to validate the proposed model.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2024.

Builds on

7 of 35 references.

References · 7

  1. 2015Holistically-Nested Edge Detectioncited by 590
  2. 2016Richer Convolutional Features for Edge Detectioncited by 141
  3. 2019Dense Extreme Inception Network: Towards a Robust CNN Model for Edge Detectioncited by 104
  4. 2019Bi-Directional Cascade Network for Perceptual Edge Detectioncited by 71
  5. 2014DeepEdge: A Multi-Scale Bifurcated Deep Network for Top-Down Contour Detectioncited by 50
  6. 2017A survey of exemplar-based texture synthesiscited by 13
  7. 2019On the Self-Similarity of Natural Stochastic Texturescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.