mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Can Large Language Models Solve Robot Routing?

arXiv 2403.10795 ↗First posted 16 Mar 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Routing problems are common in mobile robotics, encompassing tasks such as inspection, surveillance, and coverage. Depending on the objective and constraints, these problems often reduce to variants of the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP), with solutions traditionally derived by translating high-level objectives into an optimization formulation and using modern solvers to arrive at a solution. Here, we explore the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) to replace the entire pipeline from tasks described in natural language to the generation of robot routes. We systematically investigate the performance of LLMs in robot routing by constructing a dataset with 80 unique robot routing problems across 8 variants in both single and multi-robot settings. We evaluate LLMs through three frameworks: single attempt, self-debugging, and self-debugging with self-verification and various contexts, including mathematical formulations, pseudo-code, and related research papers. Our findings reveal that both self-debugging and self-verification enhance success rates without significantly lowering the optimality gap. We observe context-sensitive behavior - providing mathematical formulations as context decreases the optimality gap but significantly decreases success rates and providing pseudo-code and related research papers as context does not consistently improve success rates or decrease the optimality gap. We identify key challenges and propose future directions to enhance LLM performance in solving robot routing problems. Our source code is available on the project website: https://sites.google.com/view/words-to-routes/.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2024.

Builds on

21 of 36 references.

References · 21

  1. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  2. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  3. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  4. 2023Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debugcited by 963
  5. 2022CodeGen: An Open Large Language Model for Code with Multi-Turn Program Synthesiscited by 876
  6. 2023Large Language Models as Optimizerscited by 830
  7. 2023LLM+P: Empowering Large Language Models with Optimal Planning Proficiencycited by 496
  8. 2022LM-Nav: Robotic Navigation with Large Pre-Trained Models of Language, Vision, and Actioncited by 435
  9. 2023Language Models can Solve Computer Taskscited by 371
  10. 2024ReEvo: Large Language Models as Hyper-Heuristics with Reflective Evolutioncited by 266
  11. 2024LLMs Can't Plan, But Can Help Planning in LLM-Modulo Frameworkscited by 178
  12. 2023Large Language Models as Evolutionary Optimizerscited by 122
9 more
  1. 2022Coder Reviewer Reranking for Code Generationcited by 83
  2. 2023Algorithm Evolution Using Large Language Modelcited by 52
  3. 2024In-Context Principle Learning from Mistakescited by 42
  4. 2024Why Solving Multi-agent Path Finding with Large Language Model has not Succeeded Yetcited by 22
  5. 2024How Multimodal Integration Boost the Performance of LLM for Optimization: Case Study on Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problemscited by 12
  6. 2020Robust Multiple-Path Orienteering Problem: Securing Against Adversarial Attackscited by 8
  7. 2016Informative Planning and Online Learning with Sparse Gaussian Processescited by 5
  8. 2017Data-Driven Learning and Planning for Environmental Samplingcited by 3
  9. 2023AG-CVG: Coverage Planning with a Mobile Recharging UGV and an Energy-Constrained UAVcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

6 papers.