Variation Due to Regularization Tractably Recovers Bayesian Deep Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Uncertainty quantification in deep learning is crucial for safe and reliable decision-making in downstream tasks. Existing methods quantify uncertainty at the last layer or other approximations of the network which may miss some sources of uncertainty in the model. To address this gap, we propose an uncertainty quantification method for large networks based on variation due to regularization. Essentially, predictions that are more (less) sensitive to the regularization of network parameters are less (more, respectively) certain. This principle can be implemented by deterministically tweaking the training loss during the fine-tuning phase and reflects confidence in the output as a function of all layers of the network. We show that regularization variation (RegVar) provides rigorous uncertainty estimates that, in the infinitesimal limit, exactly recover the Laplace approximation in Bayesian deep learning. We demonstrate its success in several deep learning architectures, showing it can scale tractably with the network size while maintaining or improving uncertainty quantification quality. Our experiments across multiple datasets show that RegVar not only identifies uncertain predictions effectively but also provides insights into the stability of learned representations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2024.
Builds on
19 of 40 references.
References · 19
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 796
- 2019A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 560
- 2015Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networkscited by 554
- 2021Laplace Redux -- Effortless Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 365
- 2020Visual Transformers: Token-based Image Representation and Processing for Computer Visioncited by 334
- 2019Optimizing Millions of Hyperparameters by Implicit Differentiationcited by 304
7 more
- 2019Approximate Inference Turns Deep Networks into Gaussian Processescited by 89
- 2019'In-Between' Uncertainty in Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 80
- 2020The Case for Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 69
- 2024Variational Learning is Effective for Large Deep Networkscited by 65
- 2024Position: Bayesian Deep Learning is Needed in the Age of Large-Scale AIcited by 62
- 2016A Variational Analysis of Stochastic Gradient Algorithmscited by 57
- 2015Bootstrapped Thompson Sampling and Deep Explorationcited by 40
Built on by
Not cited yet.