mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ViTCN: Vision Transformer Contrastive Network For Reasoning

arXiv 2403.09962 ↗First posted 15 Mar 2024cs.CVcited by 4

On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning models have achieved significant milestones in various domains, for example, computer vision models have an exceptional result in object recognition, and in natural language processing, where Large Language Models (LLM) like GPT can start a conversation with human-like proficiency. However, abstract reasoning remains a challenge for these models, Can AI really thinking like a human? still be a question yet to be answered. Raven Progressive Matrices (RPM) is a metric designed to assess human reasoning capabilities. It presents a series of eight images as a problem set, where the participant should try to discover the underlying rules among these images and select the most appropriate image from eight possible options that best completes the sequence. This task always be used to test human reasoning abilities and IQ. Zhang et al proposed a dataset called RAVEN which can be used to test Machine Learning model abstract reasoning ability. In this paper, we purposed Vision Transformer Contrastive Network which build on previous work with the Contrastive Perceptual Inference network (CoPiNet), which set a new benchmark for permutationinvariant models Raven Progressive Matrices by incorporating contrast effects from psychology, cognition, and education, and extends this foundation by leveraging the cutting-edge Vision Transformer architecture. This integration aims to further refine the machine ability to process and reason about spatial-temporal information from pixel-level inputs and global wise features on RAVEN dataset.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 14 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2024.

Builds on

14 of 18 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  5. 2019RAVEN: A Dataset for Relational and Analogical Visual rEasoNingcited by 225
  6. 2018Measuring abstract reasoning in neural networkscited by 165
  7. 2020Stratified Rule-Aware Network for Abstract Visual Reasoningcited by 72
  8. 2019Learning Perceptual Inference by Contrastingcited by 57
  9. 2020Scale-Localized Abstract Reasoningcited by 45
  10. 2021Abstract Spatial-Temporal Reasoning via Probabilistic Abduction and Executioncited by 43
  11. 2020Abstract Diagrammatic Reasoning with Multiplex Graph Networkscited by 37
  12. 2020Few-shot Visual Reasoning with Meta-analogical Contrastive Learningcited by 19
2 more
  1. 2017IQ of Neural Networkscited by 16
  2. 2023Abstract Visual Reasoning: An Algebraic Approach for Solving Raven's Progressive Matricescited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022Effective Abstract Reasoning with Dual-Contrast Network
  2. 2023Learning Abstract Visual Reasoning via Task Decomposition: A Case Study in Raven Progressive Matrices
  3. 2022Deep Learning Methods for Abstract Visual Reasoning: A Survey on Raven's Progressive Matrices
  4. 2024A-I-RAVEN and I-RAVEN-Mesh: Two New Benchmarks for Abstract Visual Reasoning
  5. 2022Visual-Imagery-Based Analogical Construction in Geometric Matrix Reasoning Task
  6. 2024A Feature-based Generalizable Prediction Model for Both Perceptual and Abstract Reasoning
  7. 2023Learning to reason over visual objects
  8. 2024How Far Are We from Intelligent Visual Deductive Reasoning?