Learning Abstract Visual Reasoning via Task Decomposition: A Case Study in Raven Progressive Matrices
On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning to perform abstract reasoning often requires decomposing the task in question into intermediate subgoals that are not specified upfront, but need to be autonomously devised by the learner. In Raven Progressive Matrices (RPM), the task is to choose one of the available answers given a context, where both the context and answers are composite images featuring multiple objects in various spatial arrangements. As this high-level goal is the only guidance available, learning to solve RPMs is challenging. In this study, we propose a deep learning architecture based on the transformer blueprint which, rather than directly making the above choice, addresses the subgoal of predicting the visual properties of individual objects and their arrangements. The multidimensional predictions obtained in this way are then directly juxtaposed to choose the answer. We consider a few ways in which the model parses the visual input into tokens and several regimes of masking parts of the input in self-supervised training. In experimental assessment, the models not only outperform state-of-the-art methods but also provide interesting insights and partial explanations about the inference. The design of the method also makes it immune to biases that are known to be present in some RPM benchmarks.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 18 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2023.
Builds on
18 of 26 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2022Effective Abstract Reasoning with Dual-Contrast Network27 May
- 2022Deep Learning Methods for Abstract Visual Reasoning: A Survey on Raven's Progressive Matrices28 Jan
Other references · 16
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
- 2021EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Trainingcited by 1,135
- 2017Understanding the Effective Receptive Field in Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 553
- 2019RAVEN: A Dataset for Relational and Analogical Visual rEasoNingcited by 226
- 2018Measuring abstract reasoning in neural networkscited by 166
- 2020Stratified Rule-Aware Network for Abstract Visual Reasoningcited by 72
- 2019Learning Perceptual Inference by Contrastingcited by 57
- 2020The Scattering Compositional Learner: Discovering Objects, Attributes, Relationships in Analogical Reasoningcited by 46
4 more
- 2020Scale-Localized Abstract Reasoningcited by 45
- 2020Multi-Label Contrastive Learning for Abstract Visual Reasoningcited by 24
- 2020Few-shot Visual Reasoning with Meta-analogical Contrastive Learningcited by 19
- 2019Attention on Abstract Visual Reasoningcited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Learning to reason over visual objects
- 2024A-I-RAVEN and I-RAVEN-Mesh: Two New Benchmarks for Abstract Visual Reasoning
- 2024Towards Generative Abstract Reasoning: Completing Raven's Progressive Matrix via Rule Abstraction and Selection
- 2024Learning Visual Abstract Reasoning through Dual-Stream Networks
- 2022SAViR-T: Spatially Attentive Visual Reasoning with Transformers
- 2024Probabilistic Abduction for Visual Abstract Reasoning via Learning Rules in Vector-symbolic Architectures
- 2024A Unified View of Abstract Visual Reasoning Problems
- 2025A Study of Rule Omission in Raven's Progressive Matrices