mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Predicting Generalization of AI Colonoscopy Models to Unseen Data

arXiv 2403.09920 ↗First posted 14 Mar 2024eess.IV cs.AI cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Background: Generalizability of AI colonoscopy algorithms is important for wider adoption in clinical practice. However, current techniques for evaluating performance on unseen data require expensive and time-intensive labels. Methods: We use a "Masked Siamese Network" (MSN) to identify novel phenomena in unseen data and predict polyp detector performance. MSN is trained to predict masked out regions of polyp images, without any labels. We test MSN's ability to be trained on data only from Israel and detect unseen techniques, narrow-band imaging (NBI) and chromendoscoy (CE), on colonoscopes from Japan (354 videos, 128 hours). We also test MSN's ability to predict performance of Computer Aided Detection (CADe) of polyps on colonoscopies from both countries, even though MSN is not trained on data from Japan. Results: MSN correctly identifies NBI and CE as less similar to Israel whitelight than Japan whitelight (bootstrapped z-test, |z| > 496, p < 10^-8 for both) using the label-free Frechet distance. MSN detects NBI with 99% accuracy, predicts CE better than our heuristic (90% vs 79% accuracy) despite being trained only on whitelight, and is the only method that is robust to noisy labels. MSN predicts CADe polyp detector performance on in-domain Israel and out-of-domain Japan colonoscopies (r=0.79, 0.37 respectively). With few examples of Japan detector performance to train on, MSN prediction of Japan performance improves (r=0.56). Conclusion: Our technique can identify distribution shifts in clinical data and can predict CADe detector performance on unseen data, without labels. Our self-supervised approach can aid in detecting when data in practice is different from training, such as between hospitals or data has meaningfully shifted from training. MSN has potential for application to medical image domains beyond colonoscopy.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2024.

Builds on

15 of 49 references.

References · 15

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  2. 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,320
  3. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  4. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
  5. 2017Deep Image Priorcited by 1,097
  6. 2021Tokens-to-Token ViT: Training Vision Transformers from Scratch on ImageNetcited by 1,096
  7. 2020Spatiotemporal Contrastive Video Representation Learningcited by 372
  8. 2021Domain Adaptation for Medical Image Analysis: A Surveycited by 351
  9. 2022Masked Siamese Networks for Label-Efficient Learningcited by 301
  10. 2020Towards Learning a Universal Non-Semantic Representation of Speechcited by 84
  11. 2019Personalizing ASR for Dysarthric and Accented Speech with Limited Datacited by 45
  12. 2021Universal Paralinguistic Speech Representations Using Self-Supervised Conformerscited by 32
3 more
  1. 2023Self-Supervised Learning for Endoscopic Video Analysiscited by 22
  2. 2023Self-Supervised Polyp Re-Identification in Colonoscopycited by 8
  3. 2022The Need for Medically Aware Video Compression in Gastroenterologycited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.