FakeWatch: A Framework for Detecting Fake News to Ensure Credible Elections
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In today's technologically driven world, the rapid spread of fake news, particularly during critical events like elections, poses a growing threat to the integrity of information. To tackle this challenge head-on, we introduce FakeWatch, a comprehensive framework carefully designed to detect fake news. Leveraging a newly curated dataset of North American election-related news articles, we construct robust classification models. Our framework integrates a model hub comprising of both traditional machine learning (ML) techniques, and state-of-the-art Language Models (LMs) to discern fake news effectively. Our objective is to provide the research community with adaptable and precise classification models adept at identifying fake news for the elections agenda. Quantitative evaluations of fake news classifiers on our dataset reveal that, while state-of-the-art LMs exhibit a slight edge over traditional ML models, classical models remain competitive due to their balance of accuracy and computational efficiency. Additionally, qualitative analyses shed light on patterns within fake news articles. We provide our labeled data at https://huggingface.co/datasets/newsmediabias/fake_news_elections_labelled_data and model https://huggingface.co/newsmediabias/FakeWatch for reproducibility and further research.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2024.
Builds on
13 of 47 references.
References · 13
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,601
- 2023A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivitycited by 894
- 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 870
- 2017"Liar, Liar Pants on Fire": A New Benchmark Dataset for Fake News Detectioncited by 363
- 2018FakeNewsNet: A Data Repository with News Content, Social Context and Spatialtemporal Information for Studying Fake News on Social Mediacited by 285
- 2023Combating Misinformation in the Age of LLMs: Opportunities and Challengescited by 95
- 2019r/Fakeddit: A New Multimodal Benchmark Dataset for Fine-grained Fake News Detectioncited by 55
- 2019Exploiting Multi-domain Visual Information for Fake News Detectioncited by 48
- 2023NBIAS: A Natural Language Processing Framework for Bias Identification in Textcited by 23
- 2018The PS-Battles Dataset - an Image Collection for Image Manipulation Detectioncited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2025ADMIT: Few-shot Knowledge Poisoning Attacks on RAG-based Fact Checkingcited by 10
- 2025Beyond speculation: Measuring the growing presence of LLM-generated texts in multilingual disinformationcited by 1
- 2026Wisdom of the LLM Crowd: A Large Scale Benchmark of Multi-Label U.S. Election-Related Harmful Social Media Contentcited by 0
- 2026Wisdom of the LLM Crowd: A Large Scale Benchmark of Multi-Label U.S. Election-Related Harmful Social Media Content12 Feb 2026
- 2025ADMIT: Few-shot Knowledge Poisoning Attacks on RAG-based Fact Checking11 Oct 2025
- 2025Beyond speculation: Measuring the growing presence of LLM-generated texts in multilingual disinformation29 Mar 2025