Scaling Behavior of Machine Translation with Large Language Models under Prompt Injection Attacks
On the map: LLM safety and security → Prompt injection and agent security
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly becoming the preferred foundation platforms for many Natural Language Processing tasks such as Machine Translation, owing to their quality often comparable to or better than task-specific models, and the simplicity of specifying the task through natural language instructions or in-context examples. Their generality, however, opens them up to subversion by end users who may embed into their requests instructions that cause the model to behave in unauthorized and possibly unsafe ways. In this work we study these Prompt Injection Attacks (PIAs) on multiple families of LLMs on a Machine Translation task, focusing on the effects of model size on the attack success rates. We introduce a new benchmark data set and we discover that on multiple language pairs and injected prompts written in English, larger models under certain conditions may become more susceptible to successful attacks, an instance of the Inverse Scaling phenomenon (McKenzie et al., 2023). To our knowledge, this is the first work to study non-trivial LLM scaling behaviour in a multi-lingual setting.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt injection and agent security, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 15 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2024.
Builds on
15 of 21 references.
References · 15
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
- 2020Multilingual Denoising Pre-training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,028
- 2021BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answeringcited by 683
- 2021Scaling Laws for Transfercited by 265
- 2023Prompting Large Language Model for Machine Translation: A Case Studycited by 247
- 2023Inverse Scaling: When Bigger Isn't Bettercited by 205
3 more
- 2021Scaling Laws for Neural Machine Translationcited by 110
- 2022Inverse scaling can become U-shapedcited by 76
- 2023The Larger They Are, the Harder They Fail: Language Models do not Recognize Identifier Swaps in Pythoncited by 29
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2026The Landscape of Prompt Injection Threats in LLM Agents: From Taxonomy to Analysiscited by 25
- 2024A Multi-Perspective Analysis of Memorization in Large Language Modelscited by 8
- 2025SoK: A Comprehensive Security Analysis of Jailbreak Resilience in GPT and DeepSeek Modelscited by 1
- 2025LLM in the Middle: A Systematic Review of Threats and Mitigations to Real-World LLM-based Systemscited by 1
- 2026The Landscape of Prompt Injection Threats in LLM Agents: From Taxonomy to Analysis11 Feb 2026
- 2025LLM in the Middle: A Systematic Review of Threats and Mitigations to Real-World LLM-based Systems12 Sep 2025
- 2025SoK: A Comprehensive Security Analysis of Jailbreak Resilience in GPT and DeepSeek Models23 Jun 2025
- 2024A Multi-Perspective Analysis of Memorization in Large Language Models19 May 2024