Enhancing Security in Federated Learning through Adaptive Consensus-Based Model Update Validation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper introduces an advanced approach for fortifying Federated Learning (FL) systems against label-flipping attacks. We propose a simplified consensus-based verification process integrated with an adaptive thresholding mechanism. This dynamic thresholding is designed to adjust based on the evolving landscape of model updates, offering a refined layer of anomaly detection that aligns with the real-time needs of distributed learning environments. Our method necessitates a majority consensus among participating clients to validate updates, ensuring that only vetted and consensual modifications are applied to the global model. The efficacy of our approach is validated through experiments on two benchmark datasets in deep learning, CIFAR-10 and MNIST. Our results indicate a significant mitigation of label-flipping attacks, bolstering the FL system's resilience. This method transcends conventional techniques that depend on anomaly detection or statistical validation by incorporating a verification layer reminiscent of blockchain's participatory validation without the associated cryptographic overhead. The innovation of our approach rests in striking an optimal balance between heightened security measures and the inherent limitations of FL systems, such as computational efficiency and data privacy. Implementing a consensus mechanism specifically tailored for FL environments paves the way for more secure, robust, and trustworthy distributed machine learning applications, where safeguarding data integrity and model robustness is critical.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2024.
Builds on
16 of 28 references.
References · 16
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,531
- 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,461
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 745
- 2018Federated Learning for Mobile Keyboard Predictioncited by 565
- 2019Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysiscited by 528
- 2018Defense-GAN: Protecting Classifiers Against Adversarial Attacks Using Generative Modelscited by 362
- 2018Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lenscited by 346
- 2019Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection: Autonomous Driving when Winter is Comingcited by 332
- 2019Robust Aggregation for Federated Learningcited by 314
- 2020Data Poisoning Attacks Against Federated Learning Systemscited by 266
4 more
- 2019Client-Edge-Cloud Hierarchical Federated Learningcited by 202
- 2020Threats to Federated Learning: A Surveycited by 171
- 2018Mitigating Sybils in Federated Learning Poisoningcited by 158
- 2018Multi-Institutional Deep Learning Modeling Without Sharing Patient Data: A Feasibility Study on Brain Tumor Segmentationcited by 148
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.