mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Self-Evaluation of Large Language Model based on Glass-box Features

arXiv 2403.04222 ↗First posted 7 Mar 2024cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The proliferation of open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) underscores the pressing need for evaluation methods. Existing works primarily rely on external evaluators, focusing on training and prompting strategies. However, a crucial aspect, model-aware glass-box features, is overlooked. In this study, we explore the utility of glass-box features under the scenario of self-evaluation, namely applying an LLM to evaluate its own output. We investigate various glass-box feature groups and discovered that the softmax distribution serves as a reliable quality indicator for self-evaluation. Experimental results on public benchmarks validate the feasibility of self-evaluation of LLMs using glass-box features.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2024.

Builds on

14 of 25 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  5. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,182
  6. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
  7. 2023JudgeLM: Fine-tuned Large Language Models are Scalable Judgescited by 351
  8. 2023PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimizationcited by 311
  9. 2023Label Words are Anchors: An Information Flow Perspective for Understanding In-Context Learningcited by 235
  10. 2020Unsupervised Quality Estimation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 210
  11. 2023Self-Evaluation Guided Beam Search for Reasoningcited by 195
  12. 2020Tangled up in BLEU: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation Metricscited by 155
2 more
  1. 2018Quantifying Uncertainties in Natural Language Processing Taskscited by 79
  2. 2017Confidence through Attentioncited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4.

5 papers.