mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Enhancing Instructional Quality: Leveraging Computer-Assisted Textual Analysis to Generate In-Depth Insights from Educational Artifacts

arXiv 2403.03920 ↗First posted 6 Mar 2024cs.AI cs.CL cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper explores the transformative potential of computer-assisted textual analysis in enhancing instructional quality through in-depth insights from educational artifacts. We integrate Richard Elmore's Instructional Core Framework to examine how artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) methods, particularly natural language processing (NLP), can analyze educational content, teacher discourse, and student responses to foster instructional improvement. Through a comprehensive review and case studies within the Instructional Core Framework, we identify key areas where AI/ML integration offers significant advantages, including teacher coaching, student support, and content development. We unveil patterns that indicate AI/ML not only streamlines administrative tasks but also introduces novel pathways for personalized learning, providing actionable feedback for educators and contributing to a richer understanding of instructional dynamics. This paper emphasizes the importance of aligning AI/ML technologies with pedagogical goals to realize their full potential in educational settings, advocating for a balanced approach that considers ethical considerations, data quality, and the integration of human expertise.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2024.

Builds on

13 of 48 references.

References · 13

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  3. 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 966
  4. 2023PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimizationcited by 316
  5. 2022Will we run out of data? Limits of LLM scaling based on human-generated datacited by 195
  6. 2023A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failurescited by 168
  7. 2023Red teaming ChatGPT via Jailbreaking: Bias, Robustness, Reliability and Toxicitycited by 89
  8. 2023ChatGPT is not all you need. A State of the Art Review of large Generative AI modelscited by 86
  9. 2023GPT Can Solve Mathematical Problems Without a Calculatorcited by 68
  10. 2023Fine-tuning ChatGPT for Automatic Scoringcited by 51
  11. 2022Machine Learning Model Sizes and the Parameter Gapcited by 39
  12. 2023Is ChatGPT a Good Teacher Coach? Measuring Zero-Shot Performance For Scoring and Providing Actionable Insights on Classroom Instructioncited by 37
1 more
  1. 2021Personalized Education in the AI Era: What to Expect Next?cited by 13

Built on by

Not cited yet.