Enhancing Multi-Domain Automatic Short Answer Grading through an Explainable Neuro-Symbolic Pipeline
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Grading short answer questions automatically with interpretable reasoning behind the grading decision is a challenging goal for current transformer approaches. Justification cue detection, in combination with logical reasoners, has shown a promising direction for neuro-symbolic architectures in ASAG. But, one of the main challenges is the requirement of annotated justification cues in the students' responses, which only exist for a few ASAG datasets. To overcome this challenge, we contribute (1) a weakly supervised annotation procedure for justification cues in ASAG datasets, and (2) a neuro-symbolic model for explainable ASAG based on justification cues. Our approach improves upon the RMSE by 0.24 to 0.3 compared to the state-of-the-art on the Short Answer Feedback dataset in a bilingual, multi-domain, and multi-question training setup. This result shows that our approach provides a promising direction for generating high-quality grades and accompanying explanations for future research in ASAG and educational NLP.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2024.
Builds on
6 of 24 references.
References · 6
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
- 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,181
- 2020Multilingual Denoising Pre-training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,035
- 2022A Survey on Programmatic Weak Supervisioncited by 66
- 2021skweak: Weak Supervision Made Easy for NLPcited by 17
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025Neuro-Symbolic AI in 2024: A Systematic Reviewcited by 38
- 2025Neuro-Symbolic AI in 2024: A Systematic Review9 Jan 2025