Indirectly Parameterized Concrete Autoencoders
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Feature selection is a crucial task in settings where data is high-dimensional or acquiring the full set of features is costly. Recent developments in neural network-based embedded feature selection show promising results across a wide range of applications. Concrete Autoencoders (CAEs), considered state-of-the-art in embedded feature selection, may struggle to achieve stable joint optimization, hurting their training time and generalization. In this work, we identify that this instability is correlated with the CAE learning duplicate selections. To remedy this, we propose a simple and effective improvement: Indirectly Parameterized CAEs (IP-CAEs). IP-CAEs learn an embedding and a mapping from it to the Gumbel-Softmax distributions' parameters. Despite being simple to implement, IP-CAE exhibits significant and consistent improvements over CAE in both generalization and training time across several datasets for reconstruction and classification. Unlike CAE, IP-CAE effectively leverages non-linear relationships and does not require retraining the jointly optimized decoder. Furthermore, our approach is, in principle, generalizable to Gumbel-Softmax distributions beyond feature selection.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2024.
Builds on
15 of 39 references.
References · 15
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2016The Concrete Distribution: A Continuous Relaxation of Discrete Random Variablescited by 1,135
- 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 897
- 2017Learning Sparse Neural Networks through L0 Regularizationcited by 571
- 2018Learning to Explain: An Information-Theoretic Perspective on Model Interpretationcited by 248
- 2014Controlling the false discovery rate via knockoffscited by 97
- 2019Concrete Autoencoders for Differentiable Feature Selection and Reconstructioncited by 90
- 2021Generalized Jensen-Shannon Divergence Loss for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 74
- 2020Experimental design for MRI by greedy policy searchcited by 40
- 2023A Performance-Driven Benchmark for Feature Selection in Tabular Deep Learningcited by 23
- 2022Where to Pay Attention in Sparse Training for Feature Selection?cited by 15
- 2021End-to-end learnable EEG channel selection for deep neural networks with Gumbel-softmaxcited by 12
3 more
- 2022Multiple Importance Sampling ELBO and Deep Ensembles of Variational Approximationscited by 12
- 2020Learning Randomly Perturbed Structured Predictors for Direct Loss Minimizationcited by 6
- 2022Cooperation in the Latent Space: The Benefits of Adding Mixture Components in Variational Autoencoderscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.