User Characteristics in Explainable AI: The Rabbit Hole of Personalization?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As Artificial Intelligence (AI) becomes ubiquitous, the need for Explainable AI (XAI) has become critical for transparency and trust among users. A significant challenge in XAI is catering to diverse users, such as data scientists, domain experts, and end-users. Recent research has started to investigate how users' characteristics impact interactions with and user experience of explanations, with a view to personalizing XAI. However, are we heading down a rabbit hole by focusing on unimportant details? Our research aimed to investigate how user characteristics are related to using, understanding, and trusting an AI system that provides explanations. Our empirical study with 149 participants who interacted with an XAI system that flagged inappropriate comments showed that very few user characteristics mattered; only age and the personality trait openness influenced actual understanding. Our work provides evidence to reorient user-focused XAI research and question the pursuit of personalized XAI based on fine-grained user characteristics.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Feb 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 5; 2026: 4.
12 papers.
- 2024Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Medical Applications: A Reviewcited by 12
- 2026Persona Prompting as a Lens on LLM Social Reasoningcited by 3
- 2024People Attribute Purpose to Autonomous Vehicles When Explaining Their Behavior: Insights from Cognitive Science for Explainable AIcited by 2
- 2025Investigating Co-Constructive Behavior of Large Language Models in Explanation Dialoguescited by 2
- 2025Through Their Eyes: User Perceptions on Sensitive Attribute Inference of Social Media Videos by Visual Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026PONTE: Personalized Orchestration for Natural Language Trustworthy Explanationscited by 1
- 2024Dataset resulting from the user study on comprehensibility of explainable AI algorithmscited by 0
- 2025Gap the (Theory of) Mind: Sharing Beliefs About Teammates' Goals Boosts Collaboration Perception, Not Performancecited by 0
- 2025Explanation User Interfaces: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 0
- 2025JEEVHITAA -- An HCAI Ecosystem to Support Collective Carecited by 0
- 2026Exploring Learners' Expectations and Engagement When Collaborating with Constructively Controversial Peer Agentscited by 0
- 2026XAI-Arena: Can LLMs Assess the Quality of XAI Explanations?cited by 0
- 2026XAI-Arena: Can LLMs Assess the Quality of XAI Explanations?8 Sep 2026
- 2026PONTE: Personalized Orchestration for Natural Language Trustworthy Explanations6 Mar 2026
- 2026Persona Prompting as a Lens on LLM Social Reasoning28 Jan 2026
- 2026Exploring Learners' Expectations and Engagement When Collaborating with Constructively Controversial Peer Agents20 Jan 2026
- 2025JEEVHITAA -- An HCAI Ecosystem to Support Collective Care6 Dec 2025
- 2025Through Their Eyes: User Perceptions on Sensitive Attribute Inference of Social Media Videos by Visual Language Models11 Aug 2025
- 2025Explanation User Interfaces: A Systematic Literature Review26 May 2025
- 2025Gap the (Theory of) Mind: Sharing Beliefs About Teammates' Goals Boosts Collaboration Perception, Not Performance6 May 2025
- 2025Investigating Co-Constructive Behavior of Large Language Models in Explanation Dialogues25 Apr 2025
- 2024Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Medical Applications: A Review15 Nov 2024
- 2024Dataset resulting from the user study on comprehensibility of explainable AI algorithms21 Oct 2024
- 2024People Attribute Purpose to Autonomous Vehicles When Explaining Their Behavior: Insights from Cognitive Science for Explainable AI11 Mar 2024