mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

To Pool or Not To Pool: Analyzing the Regularizing Effects of Group-Fair Training on Shared Models

arXiv 2402.18803 ↗First posted 29 Feb 2024cs.LG cs.CYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In fair machine learning, one source of performance disparities between groups is over-fitting to groups with relatively few training samples. We derive group-specific bounds on the generalization error of welfare-centric fair machine learning that benefit from the larger sample size of the majority group. We do this by considering group-specific Rademacher averages over a restricted hypothesis class, which contains the family of models likely to perform well with respect to a fair learning objective (e.g., a power-mean). Our simulations demonstrate these bounds improve over a naive method, as expected by theory, with particularly significant improvement for smaller group sizes.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Feb 2024.

Builds on

17 of 52 references.

References · 17

  1. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  3. 2017A Survey on Multi-Task Learningcited by 838
  4. 2016CVXPY: A Python-Embedded Modeling Language for Convex Optimizationcited by 633
  5. 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
  6. 2017A Rewriting System for Convex Optimization Problemscited by 178
  7. 2020Minimax Pareto Fairness: A Multi Objective Perspectivecited by 152
  8. 2018Why Is My Classifier Discriminatory?cited by 143
  9. 2019Distributionally Robust Language Modelingcited by 142
  10. 2019Accuracy comparison across face recognition algorithms: Where are we on measuring race bias?cited by 56
  11. 2020Active Sampling for Min-Max Fairnesscited by 33
  12. 2021Adaptive Sampling for Minimax Fair Classificationcited by 24
5 more
  1. 2021An Axiomatic Theory of Provably-Fair Welfare-Centric Machine Learningcited by 18
  2. 2020To Split or Not to Split: The Impact of Disparate Treatment in Classificationcited by 14
  3. 2020Tight Approximation Algorithms for p-Mean Welfare Under Subadditive Valuationscited by 8
  4. 2022A General Framework for Fair Allocation under Matroid Rank Valuationscited by 4
  5. 2023The Good, the Bad and the Submodular: Fairly Allocating Mixed Manna Under Order-Neutral Submodular Preferencescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.