Tight Approximation Algorithms for p-Mean Welfare Under Subadditive Valuations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We develop polynomial-time algorithms for the fair and efficient allocation of indivisible goods among n agents that have subadditive valuations over the goods. We first consider the Nash social welfare as our objective and design a polynomial-time algorithm that, in the value oracle model, finds an 8n-approximation to the Nash optimal allocation. Subadditive valuations include XOS (fractionally subadditive) and submodular valuations as special cases. Our result, even for the special case of submodular valuations, improves upon the previously best known O(n log n)-approximation ratio of Garg et al. (2020). More generally, we study maximization of p-mean welfare. The p-mean welfare is parameterized by an exponent term p ∈ (-∞, 1] and encompasses a range of welfare functions, such as social welfare (p = 1), Nash social welfare (p → 0), and egalitarian welfare (p → -∞). We give an algorithm that, for subadditive valuations and any given p ∈ (-∞, 1], computes (in the value oracle model and in polynomial time) an allocation with p-mean welfare at least frac18n times the optimal. Further, we show that our approximation guarantees are essentially tight for XOS and, hence, subadditive valuations. We adapt a result of Dobzinski et al. (2010) to show that, under XOS valuations, an O left(n1-varepsilon right) approximation for the p-mean welfare for any p ∈ (-∞,1] (including the Nash social welfare) requires exponentially many value queries; here, varepsilon>0 is any fixed constant.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 May 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
8 papers.
- 2024Temporal Fair Division of Indivisible Itemscited by 11
- 2024p-Mean Regret for Stochastic Banditscited by 6
- 2025Revisiting Social Welfare in Bandits: UCB is (Nearly) All You Needcited by 3
- 2026The Cost of EFX: Generalized-Mean Welfare and Complexity Dichotomies with Few Surplus Itemscited by 1
- 2026Improved Algorithms for Nash Welfare in Linear Banditscited by 1
- 2023Dividing Good and Better Items Among Agents with Bivalued Submodular Valuationscited by 0
- 2024To Pool or Not To Pool: Analyzing the Regularizing Effects of Group-Fair Training on Shared Modelscited by 0
- 2026Price of Fairness in Bandits: A Tight Minimax Characterizationcited by 0
- 2026Price of Fairness in Bandits: A Tight Minimax Characterization15 Jul 2026
- 2026Improved Algorithms for Nash Welfare in Linear Bandits30 Jan 2026
- 2026The Cost of EFX: Generalized-Mean Welfare and Complexity Dichotomies with Few Surplus Items19 Jan 2026
- 2025Revisiting Social Welfare in Bandits: UCB is (Nearly) All You Need24 Oct 2025
- 2024p-Mean Regret for Stochastic Bandits14 Dec 2024
- 2024Temporal Fair Division of Indivisible Items18 Oct 2024
- 2024To Pool or Not To Pool: Analyzing the Regularizing Effects of Group-Fair Training on Shared Models29 Feb 2024
- 2023Dividing Good and Better Items Among Agents with Bivalued Submodular Valuations6 Feb 2023