mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Model Free Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient Controller for Setpoint Tracking of Non-minimum Phase Systems

arXiv 2402.17703 ↗First posted 27 Feb 2024eess.SY cs.SYcited by 1

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL theory and sample complexity

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) techniques have received significant attention in control and decision-making algorithms. Most applications involve complex decision-making systems, justified by the algorithms' computational power and cost. While model-based versions are emerging, model-free DRL approaches are intriguing for their independence from models, yet they remain relatively less explored in terms of performance, particularly in applied control. This study conducts a thorough performance analysis comparing the data-driven DRL paradigm with a classical state feedback controller, both designed based on the same cost (reward) function of the linear quadratic regulator (LQR) problem. Twelve additional performance criteria are introduced to assess the controllers' performance, independent of the LQR problem for which they are designed. Two Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG)-based controllers are developed, leveraging DDPG's widespread reputation. These controllers are aimed at addressing a challenging setpoint tracking problem in a Non-Minimum Phase (NMP) system. The performance and robustness of the controllers are assessed in the presence of operational challenges, including disturbance, noise, initial conditions, and model uncertainties. The findings suggest that the DDPG controller demonstrates promising behavior under rigorous test conditions. Nevertheless, further improvements are necessary for the DDPG controller to outperform classical methods in all criteria. While DRL algorithms may excel in complex environments owing to the flexibility in the reward function definition, this paper offers practical insights and a comparison framework specifically designed to evaluate these algorithms within the context of control engineering.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 8 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2024.

Builds on

8 of 24 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
  3. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
  4. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,417
  5. 2017Asymmetric Actor Critic for Image-Based Robot Learningcited by 238
  6. 2021A Historical Perspective of Adaptive Control and Learningcited by 11
  7. 2022A Survey of Recent Machine Learning Solutions for Ship Collision Avoidance and Mission Planningcited by 3
  8. 2023Adaptive formation motion planning and control of autonomous underwater vehicles using deep reinforcement learningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Policy Gradient-based Model Free Optimal LQG Control with a Probabilistic Risk Constraint
  2. 2024Broad Critic Deep Actor Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Control
  3. 2026Soft Deterministic Policy Gradient with Gaussian Smoothing
  4. 2024Autonomous Navigation of Unmanned Vehicle Through Deep Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2026Model-Free DRL Control for Power Inverters: From Policy Learning to Real-Time Implementation via Knowledge Distillation
  6. 2025Policy Gradient Adaptive Control for the LQR: Indirect and Direct Approaches
  7. 2024Comparison of Model Predictive Control and Proximal Policy Optimization for a 1-DOF Helicopter System
  8. 2025Deterministic Policy Gradient for Reinforcement Learning with Continuous Time and State