Characterizing Dependence of Samples along the Langevin Dynamics and Algorithms via Contraction of Phi-Mutual Information
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The mixing time of a Markov chain determines how fast the iterates of the Markov chain converge to the stationary distribution; however, it does not control the dependencies between samples along the Markov chain. In this paper, we study the question of how fast the samples become approximately independent along popular Markov chains for continuous-space sampling: the Langevin dynamics in continuous time, and the Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm and the Proximal Sampler in discrete time. We measure the dependence between samples via Phi-mutual information, which is a broad generalization of the standard mutual information, and which is equal to 0 if and only if the the samples are independent. We show that along these Markov chains, the Phi-mutual information between the first and the k-th iterate decreases to 0 exponentially fast in k when the target distribution is strongly log-concave. Our proof technique is based on showing the Strong Data Processing Inequalities (SDPIs) hold along the Markov chains. To prove fast mixing of the Markov chains, we only need to show the SDPIs hold for the stationary distribution. In contrast, to prove the contraction of Phi-mutual information, we need to show the SDPIs hold along the entire trajectories of the Markov chains; we prove this when the iterates along the Markov chains satisfy the corresponding Phi-Sobolev inequality, which is implied by the strong log-concavity of the target distribution.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2024.
Builds on
19 of 88 references.
References · 19
- 2017Information-theoretic analysis of generalization capability of learning algorithmscited by 299
- 2019Rapid Convergence of the Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm: Isoperimetry Sufficescited by 224
- 2014Theoretical guarantees for approximate sampling from smooth and log-concave densitiescited by 206
- 2015Non-asymptotic convergence analysis for the Unadjusted Langevin Algorithmcited by 195
- 2018Analysis of Langevin Monte Carlo via convex optimizationcited by 126
- 2017Convergence of Langevin MCMC in KL-divergencecited by 86
- 2020Structured Logconcave Sampling with a Restricted Gaussian Oraclecited by 85
- 2022Improved analysis for a proximal algorithm for samplingcited by 72
- 2023Faster high-accuracy log-concave sampling via algorithmic warm startscited by 44
- 2023Improved dimension dependence of a proximal algorithm for samplingcited by 29
- 2021A Proximal Algorithm for Sampling from Non-smooth Potentialscited by 23
- 2022A Proximal Algorithm for Samplingcited by 21
7 more
- 2022Resolving the Mixing Time of the Langevin Algorithm to its Stationary Distribution for Log-Concave Samplingcited by 21
- 2021Mixing Time Guarantees for Unadjusted Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 18
- 2021The query complexity of sampling from strongly log-concave distributions in one dimensioncited by 18
- 2021Local Differential Privacy Is Equivalent to Contraction of Eγ-Divergencecited by 17
- 2024f-MICL: Understanding and Generalizing InfoNCE-based Contrastive Learningcited by 13
- 2021Nested hat R: Assessing the convergence of Markov chain Monte Carlo when running many short chainscited by 9
- 2021Convergence of Gaussian-smoothed optimal transport distance with sub-gamma distributions and dependent samplescited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2025Mixing Time of the Proximal Sampler in Relative Fisher Information via Strong Data Processing Inequalitycited by 11
- 2025Beyond Scores: Proximal Diffusion Modelscited by 3
- 2025An operator splitting analysis of Wasserstein--Fisher--Rao gradient flowscited by 2
- 2026A Non-asymptotic Analysis for Learning and Applying a Preconditioner in MCMCcited by 1
- 2026Preservation of Log-Concavity and Convergence of Wasserstein-Fisher-Rao Gradient Flowscited by 0
- 2026Preservation of Log-Concavity and Convergence of Wasserstein-Fisher-Rao Gradient Flows16 Sep 2026
- 2026A Non-asymptotic Analysis for Learning and Applying a Preconditioner in MCMC11 Feb 2026
- 2025An operator splitting analysis of Wasserstein--Fisher--Rao gradient flows22 Nov 2025
- 2025Beyond Scores: Proximal Diffusion Models11 Jul 2025
- 2025Mixing Time of the Proximal Sampler in Relative Fisher Information via Strong Data Processing Inequality8 Feb 2025