A priori Estimates for Deep Residual Network in Continuous-time Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep reinforcement learning excels in numerous large-scale practical applications. However, existing performance analyses ignores the unique characteristics of continuous-time control problems, is unable to directly estimate the generalization error of the Bellman optimal loss and require a boundedness assumption. Our work focuses on continuous-time control problems and proposes a method that is applicable to all such problems where the transition function satisfies semi-group and Lipschitz properties. Under this method, we can directly analyze the a priori generalization error of the Bellman optimal loss. The core of this method lies in two transformations of the loss function. To complete the transformation, we propose a decomposition method for the maximum operator. Additionally, this analysis method does not require a boundedness assumption. Finally, we obtain an a priori generalization error without the curse of dimensionality.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2024.
Builds on
27 of 50 references.
References · 27
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
- 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,404
- 2017Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 774
- 2017Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networkscited by 681
- 2018Learning and Generalization in Overparameterized Neural Networks, Going Beyond Two Layerscited by 340
- 2018Stronger generalization bounds for deep nets via a compression approachcited by 306
- 2015Norm-Based Capacity Control in Neural Networkscited by 299
- 2020Reinforcement Learning for Combinatorial Optimization: A Surveycited by 235
- 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Deep Q-Learningcited by 212
15 more
- 2021Reinforcement learning based recommender systems: A surveycited by 187
- 2017Spectral Norm Regularization for Improving the Generalizability of Deep Learningcited by 178
- 2018Turning Big data into tiny data: Constant-size coresets for k-means, PCA and projective clusteringcited by 94
- 2018A Priori Estimates of the Population Risk for Two-layer Neural Networkscited by 76
- 2022Avoiding Overfitting: A Survey on Regularization Methods for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 55
- 2021Risk Bounds and Rademacher Complexity in Batch Reinforcement Learningcited by 42
- 2018Reinforcement Learning for UAV Attitude Controlcited by 40
- 2020Reinforcement Learning with General Value Function Approximation: Provably Efficient Approach via Bounded Eluder Dimensioncited by 36
- 2021Reinforcement Learning for Quantitative Tradingcited by 24
- 2018Approximation and Estimation for High-Dimensional Deep Learning Networkscited by 22
- 2019A Priori Estimates of the Population Risk for Residual Networkscited by 14
- 2019Optimizing for Interpretability in Deep Neural Networks with Tree Regularizationcited by 13
- 2021An L2 Analysis of Reinforcement Learning in High Dimensions with Kernel and Neural Network Approximationcited by 13
- 2018Capacity Control of ReLU Neural Networks by Basis-path Normcited by 10
- 2014Rate of Convergence and Error Bounds for LSTD(λ)cited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.