Cooperation and Control in Delegation Games
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many settings of interest involving humans and machines -- from virtual personal assistants to autonomous vehicles -- can naturally be modelled as principals (humans) delegating to agents (machines), which then interact with each other on their principals' behalf. We refer to these multi-principal, multi-agent scenarios as delegation games. In such games, there are two important failure modes: problems of control (where an agent fails to act in line their principal's preferences) and problems of cooperation (where the agents fail to work well together). In this paper we formalise and analyse these problems, further breaking them down into issues of alignment (do the players have similar preferences?) and capabilities (how competent are the players at satisfying those preferences?). We show -- theoretically and empirically -- how these measures determine the principals' welfare, how they can be estimated using limited observations, and thus how they might be used to help us design more aligned and cooperative AI systems.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2024.
Builds on
10 of 59 references.
References · 10
- 2018Quantifying Generalization in Reinforcement Learningcited by 345
- 2020Open Problems in Cooperative AIcited by 167
- 2021Alignment of Language Agentscited by 167
- 2021Scalable Evaluation of Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Melting Potcited by 97
- 2020Quantifying Differences in Reward Functionscited by 62
- 2019Multi-Agent Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 60
- 2017Occam's razor is insufficient to infer the preferences of irrational agentscited by 44
- 2023A Review of Cooperation in Multi-agent Learningcited by 27
- 2013Computational Rationalization: The Inverse Equilibrium Problemcited by 24
- 2023STARC: A General Framework For Quantifying Differences Between Reward Functionscited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
- 2025Collaborating with GenAI: Incentives and Replacementscited by 1
- 2026Causal Foundations of Collective Agencycited by 0
- 2026Causal Foundations of Collective Agency30 Apr 2026
- 2025Collaborating with GenAI: Incentives and Replacements27 Aug 2025