mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DEEM: Dynamic Experienced Expert Modeling for Stance Detection

arXiv 2402.15264 ↗First posted 23 Feb 2024cs.CLcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent work has made a preliminary attempt to use large language models (LLMs) to solve the stance detection task, showing promising results. However, considering that stance detection usually requires detailed background knowledge, the vanilla reasoning method may neglect the domain knowledge to make a professional and accurate analysis. Thus, there is still room for improvement of LLMs reasoning, especially in leveraging the generation capability of LLMs to simulate specific experts (i.e., multi-agents) to detect the stance. In this paper, different from existing multi-agent works that require detailed descriptions and use fixed experts, we propose a Dynamic Experienced Expert Modeling (DEEM) method which can leverage the generated experienced experts and let LLMs reason in a semi-parametric way, making the experts more generalizable and reliable. Experimental results demonstrate that DEEM consistently achieves the best results on three standard benchmarks, outperforms methods with self-consistency reasoning, and reduces the bias of LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2024.

Builds on

28 of 50 references.

References · 28

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  4. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  5. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
  6. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
  7. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
  8. 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,168
  9. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
  10. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,422
  11. 2021Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokenscited by 1,278
  12. 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,184
16 more
  1. 2020BERTweet: A pre-trained language model for English Tweetscited by 346
  2. 2023Multi-Agent Collaboration: Harnessing the Power of Intelligent LLM Agentscited by 329
  3. 2023OpenChat: Advancing Open-source Language Models with Mixed-Quality Datacited by 250
  4. 2023Exploring Large Language Models for Communication Games: An Empirical Study on Werewolfcited by 238
  5. 2023ExpertPrompting: Instructing Large Language Models to be Distinguished Expertscited by 140
  6. 2023Automatic Prompt Augmentation and Selection with Chain-of-Thought from Labeled Datacited by 119
  7. 2016Stance Detection with Bidirectional Conditional Encodingcited by 93
  8. 2020Stance Detection on Social Media: State of the Art and Trendscited by 93
  9. 2022How would Stance Detection Techniques Evolve after the Launch of ChatGPT?cited by 76
  10. 2019Aspect-based Sentiment Classification with Aspect-specific Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 62
  11. 2020Will-They-Won't-They: A Very Large Dataset for Stance Detection on Twittercited by 53
  12. 2023Blind Judgement: Agent-Based Supreme Court Modelling With GPTcited by 37
  13. 2021Adversarial Learning for Zero-Shot Stance Detection on Social Mediacited by 36
  14. 2023Prompt-Guided Retrieval Augmentation for Non-Knowledge-Intensive Taskscited by 21
  15. 2022Infusing Knowledge from Wikipedia to Enhance Stance Detectioncited by 20
  16. 2017Trump vs. Hillary: What went Viral during the 2016 US Presidential Electioncited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 7; 2026: 1.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026A Systematic Comparison of Prompting and Multi-Agent Methods for LLM-based Stance Detection
  2. 2023Ladder-of-Thought: Using Knowledge as Steps to Elevate Stance Detection
  3. 2023Stance Detection with Collaborative Role-Infused LLM-Based Agents
  4. 2025Rethinking stance detection: A theoretically-informed research agenda for user-level inference using language models
  5. 2025Collaborative Stance Detection via Small-Large Language Model Consistency Verification
  6. 2026Multi-Agent Reasoning with Adaptive Worker Allocation for Stance Detection
  7. 2025Is External Information Useful for Stance Detection with LLMs?
  8. 2023Multi-label and Multi-target Sampling of Machine Annotation for Computational Stance Detection