Efficient data selection employing Semantic Similarity-based Graph Structures for model training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent developments in natural language processing (NLP) have highlighted the need for substantial amounts of data for models to capture textual information accurately. This raises concerns regarding the computational resources and time required for training such models. This paper introduces Semantics for data SAliency in Model performance Estimation (SeSaME). It is an efficient data sampling mechanism solely based on textual information without passing the data through a compute-heavy model or other intensive pre-processing transformations. The application of this approach is demonstrated in the use case of low-resource automated speech recognition (ASR) models, which excessively rely on text-to-speech (TTS) calls when using augmented data. SeSaME learns to categorize new incoming data points into speech recognition difficulty buckets by employing semantic similarity-based graph structures and discrete ASR information from homophilous neighbourhoods through message passing. The results indicate reliable projections of ASR performance, with a 93% accuracy increase when using the proposed method compared to random predictions, bringing non-trivial information on the impact of textual representations in speech models. Furthermore, a series of experiments show both the benefits and challenges of using the ASR information on incoming data to fine-tune the model. We report a 7% drop in validation loss compared to random sampling, 7% WER drop with non-local aggregation when evaluating against a highly difficult dataset, and 1.8% WER drop with local aggregation and high semantic similarity between datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2024.
Builds on
23 of 32 references.
References · 23
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
- 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,811
- 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,576
- 2019Common Voice: A Massively-Multilingual Speech Corpuscited by 1,384
- 2019SpecAugment: A Simple Data Augmentation Method for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 1,380
11 more
- 2019VisualBERT: A Simple and Performant Baseline for Vision and Languagecited by 1,296
- 2017Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Eracited by 919
- 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 807
- 2019DropEdge: Towards Deep Graph Convolutional Networks on Node Classificationcited by 680
- 2021VoxPopuli: A Large-Scale Multilingual Speech Corpus for Representation Learning, Semi-Supervised Learning and Interpretationcited by 463
- 2021BABEL: Bodies, Action and Behavior with English Labelscited by 265
- 2022Prioritized Training on Points that are Learnable, Worth Learning, and Not Yet Learntcited by 236
- 2020VoxLingua107: a Dataset for Spoken Language Recognitioncited by 122
- 2021An Image is Worth 16x16 Words, What is a Video Worth?cited by 87
- 2020On the Comparison of Popular End-to-End Models for Large Scale Speech Recognitioncited by 63
- 2018Information-theoretic Limits for Community Detection in Network Modelscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.