Stable Update of Regression Trees
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Updating machine learning models with new information usually improves their predictive performance, yet, in many applications, it is also desirable to avoid changing the model predictions too much. This property is called stability. In most cases when stability matters, so does explainability. We therefore focus on the stability of an inherently explainable machine learning method, namely regression trees. We aim to use the notion of empirical stability and design algorithms for updating regression trees that provide a way to balance between predictability and empirical stability. To achieve this, we propose a regularization method, where data points are weighted based on the uncertainty in the initial model. The balance between predictability and empirical stability can be adjusted through hyperparameters. This regularization method is evaluated in terms of loss and stability and assessed on a broad range of data characteristics. The results show that the proposed update method improves stability while achieving similar or better predictive performance. This shows that it is possible to achieve both predictive and stable results when updating regression trees.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2024.
Builds on
6 of 25 references.
References · 6
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,143
- 2018Optimization with Non-Differentiable Constraints with Applications to Fairness, Recall, Churn, and Other Goalscited by 103
- 2016Satisfying Real-world Goals with Dataset Constraintscited by 68
- 2022Model Stability with Continuous Data Updatescited by 9
- 2013Estimation Stability with Cross Validation (ESCV)cited by 7
- 2020An information criterion for automatic gradient tree boostingcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.