Model Stability with Continuous Data Updates
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we study the "stability" of machine learning (ML) models within the context of larger, complex NLP systems with continuous training data updates. For this study, we propose a methodology for the assessment of model stability (which we refer to as jitter under various experimental conditions. We find that model design choices, including network architecture and input representation, have a critical impact on stability through experiments on four text classification tasks and two sequence labeling tasks. In classification tasks, non-RNN-based models are observed to be more stable than RNN-based ones, while the encoder-decoder model is less stable in sequence labeling tasks. Moreover, input representations based on pre-trained fastText embeddings contribute to more stability than other choices. We also show that two learning strategies -- ensemble models and incremental training -- have a significant influence on stability. We recommend ML model designers account for trade-offs in accuracy and jitter when making modeling choices.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jan 2022.
Builds on
13 of 30 references.
References · 13
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,578
- 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,124
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
- 2018Snips Voice Platform: an embedded Spoken Language Understanding system for private-by-design voice interfacescited by 376
- 2018Measuring the Intrinsic Dimension of Objective Landscapescited by 364
- 2018Optimization with Non-Differentiable Constraints with Applications to Fairness, Recall, Churn, and Other Goalscited by 103
- 2016Satisfying Real-world Goals with Dataset Constraintscited by 68
- 2016Degrees of Freedom in Deep Neural Networkscited by 14
- 2017ALL-IN-1: Short Text Classification with One Model for All Languagescited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 5; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
9 papers.
- 2023Similarity of Neural Network Models: A Survey of Functional and Representational Measurescited by 128
- 2023Backward Compatibility During Data Updates by Weight Interpolationcited by 7
- 2023Measuring the Instability of Fine-Tuningcited by 7
- 2022On the Prediction Instability of Graph Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2023An Epistemic and Aleatoric Decomposition of Arbitrariness to Constrain the Set of Good Modelscited by 1
- 2025PyTDC: A multimodal machine learning training, evaluation, and inference platform for biomedical foundation modelscited by 1
- 2023Distilling Influences to Mitigate Prediction Churn in Graph Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2024Stable Update of Regression Treescited by 0
- 2025Revisiting the Relation Between Robustness and Universalitycited by 0
- 2025Revisiting the Relation Between Robustness and Universality22 Oct 2025
- 2025PyTDC: A multimodal machine learning training, evaluation, and inference platform for biomedical foundation models8 May 2025
- 2024Stable Update of Regression Trees21 Feb 2024
- 2023Distilling Influences to Mitigate Prediction Churn in Graph Neural Networks2 Oct 2023
- 2023Similarity of Neural Network Models: A Survey of Functional and Representational Measures10 May 2023
- 2023Measuring the Instability of Fine-Tuning15 Feb 2023
- 2023An Epistemic and Aleatoric Decomposition of Arbitrariness to Constrain the Set of Good Models9 Feb 2023
- 2023Backward Compatibility During Data Updates by Weight Interpolation25 Jan 2023
- 2022On the Prediction Instability of Graph Neural Networks20 May 2022