mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Harnessing Large Language Models as Post-hoc Correctors

arXiv 2402.13414 ↗First posted 20 Feb 2024cs.LG cs.CLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As Machine Learning (ML) models grow in size and demand higher-quality training data, the expenses associated with re-training and fine-tuning these models are escalating rapidly. Inspired by recent impressive achievements of Large Language Models (LLMs) in different fields, this paper delves into the question: can LLMs efficiently improve an ML's performance at a minimal cost? We show that, through our proposed training-free framework LlmCorr, an LLM can work as a post-hoc corrector to propose corrections for the predictions of an arbitrary ML model. In particular, we form a contextual knowledge database by incorporating the dataset's label information and the ML model's predictions on the validation dataset. Leveraging the in-context learning capability of LLMs, we ask the LLM to summarise the instances in which the ML model makes mistakes and the correlation between primary predictions and true labels. Following this, the LLM can transfer its acquired knowledge to suggest corrections for the ML model's predictions. Our experimental results on text analysis and the challenging molecular predictions show that model improves the performance of a number of models by up to 39%.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2024.

Builds on

25 of 45 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  4. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  5. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  6. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  7. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  8. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  9. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
  10. 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,163
  11. 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,254
  12. 2017MoleculeNet: A Benchmark for Molecular Machine Learningcited by 1,051
13 more
  1. 2023How Good Are GPT Models at Machine Translation? A Comprehensive Evaluationcited by 348
  2. 2021OGB-LSC: A Large-Scale Challenge for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 329
  3. 2020Transformers as Soft Reasoners over Languagecited by 270
  4. 2023Automatically Correcting Large Language Models: Surveying the landscape of diverse self-correction strategiescited by 238
  5. 2023GPT4Graph: Can Large Language Models Understand Graph Structured Data ? An Empirical Evaluation and Benchmarkingcited by 210
  6. 2020Combining Label Propagation and Simple Models Out-performs Graph Neural Networkscited by 202
  7. 2022Active Example Selection for In-Context Learningcited by 196
  8. 2023The Capacity for Moral Self-Correction in Large Language Modelscited by 173
  9. 2024Scientific Large Language Models: A Survey on Biological & Chemical Domainscited by 80
  10. 2023Post Hoc Explanations of Language Models Can Improve Language Modelscited by 50
  11. 2021Pooling Architecture Search for Graph Classificationcited by 36
  12. 2022Simplifying Node Classification on Heterophilous Graphs with Compatible Label Propagationcited by 7
  13. 2023Knowledge-augmented Graph Machine Learning for Drug Discovery: A Surveycited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

7 papers.