When Only Time Will Tell: Interpreting How Transformers Process Local Ambiguities Through the Lens of Restart-Incrementality
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Incremental models that process sentences one token at a time will sometimes encounter points where more than one interpretation is possible. Causal models are forced to output one interpretation and continue, whereas models that can revise may edit their previous output as the ambiguity is resolved. In this work, we look at how restart-incremental Transformers build and update internal states, in an effort to shed light on what processes cause revisions not viable in autoregressive models. We propose an interpretable way to analyse the incremental states, showing that their sequential structure encodes information on the garden path effect and its resolution. Our method brings insights on various bidirectional encoders for contextualised meaning representation and dependency parsing, contributing to show their advantage over causal models when it comes to revisions.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 90 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2024.
Builds on
44 of 90 references.
References · 44
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,464
- 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,046
- 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 994
- 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 807
- 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 759
- 2020Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languagescited by 719
- 2023Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lenscited by 579
- 2022Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Spacecited by 522
- 2019Linguistic Knowledge and Transferability of Contextual Representationscited by 382
32 more
- 2016Deep Biaffine Attention for Neural Dependency Parsingcited by 334
- 2018Analysis Methods in Neural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 276
- 2019Neural Language Models as Psycholinguistic Subjects: Representations of Syntactic Statecited by 137
- 2023We're Afraid Language Models Aren't Modeling Ambiguitycited by 124
- 2023Sudden Drops in the Loss: Syntax Acquisition, Phase Transitions, and Simplicity Bias in MLMscited by 121
- 2023Future Lens: Anticipating Subsequent Tokens from a Single Hidden Statecited by 116
- 2023Jump to Conclusions: Short-Cutting Transformers With Linear Transformationscited by 89
- 2020Back to the Future: Unsupervised Backprop-based Decoding for Counterfactual and Abductive Commonsense Reasoningcited by 65
- 2021Machine Translation Decoding beyond Beam Searchcited by 55
- 2022Problems with Cosine as a Measure of Embedding Similarity for High Frequency Wordscited by 49
- 2023Explaining How Transformers Use Context to Build Predictionscited by 42
- 2019Viable Dependency Parsing as Sequence Labelingcited by 34
- 2021A Targeted Assessment of Incremental Processing in Neural LanguageModels and Humanscited by 32
- 2020Re-translation versus Streaming for Simultaneous Translationcited by 30
- 2022Syntactic Surprisal From Neural Models Predicts, But Underestimates, Human Processing Difficulty From Syntactic Ambiguitiescited by 30
- 2019Re-Translation Strategies For Long Form, Simultaneous, Spoken Language Translationcited by 24
- 2022Probing for Incremental Parse States in Autoregressive Language Modelscited by 24
- 2024Looking Right is Sometimes Right: Investigating the Capabilities of Decoder-only LLMs for Sequence Labelingcited by 24
- 2021Towards Incremental Transformers: An Empirical Analysis of Transformer Models for Incremental NLUcited by 16
- 2021The Language Model Understood the Prompt was Ambiguous: Probing Syntactic Uncertainty Through Generationcited by 15
- 2022On the Role of Bidirectionality in Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 15
- 2020Incremental Processing in the Age of Non-Incremental Encoders: An Empirical Assessment of Bidirectional Models for Incremental NLUcited by 13
- 2022Teaching BERT to Wait: Balancing Accuracy and Latency for Streaming Disfluency Detectioncited by 12
- 2018Incremental Natural Language Processing: Challenges, Strategies, and Evaluationcited by 8
- 2023TAPIR: Learning Adaptive Revision for Incremental Natural Language Understanding with a Two-Pass Modelcited by 5
- 2019Assessing incrementality in sequence-to-sequence modelscited by 4
- 2022Garden-Path Traversal in GPT-2cited by 4
- 2023Efficient Encoders for Streaming Sequence Taggingcited by 4
- 2021Reconsidering the Past: Optimizing Hidden States in Language Modelscited by 3
- 2019Incrementalizing RASA's Open-Source Natural Language Understanding Pipelinecited by 2
- 2023Structural Ambiguity and its Disambiguation in Language Model Based Parsers: the Case of Dutch Clause Relativizationcited by 2
- 2023The Road to Quality is Paved with Good Revisions: A Detailed Evaluation Methodology for Revision Policies in Incremental Sequence Labellingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.